Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 21;17(20):7680. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207680

Table 1.

Regression results of the econometric model.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
GER −115.577 *** −115.047 *** −118.454 *** −112.991 *** −105.736 ***
(−10.91) (−10.75) (−11.21) (−11.74) (−11.99)
GER2 3451.456 *** 3429.727 *** 3474.165 *** 3336.962 *** 3109.288 ***
(7.42) (7.31) (7.53) (7.95) (8.10)
lnCI 0.015 0.034 −0.177 *** −0.197 *** −0.219 ***
(0.37) (0.86) (−4.12) (−5.03) (−4.58)
lnLI −0.253 *** −0.338 *** −0.382 *** −0.346 ***
(−3.72) (−5.39) (−6.65) (−5.21)
lnAGDP 1.216 *** 0.482 *** 0.506 ***
(8.90) (3.20) (2.76)
lnISL −0.933 *** −1.043 ***
(−8.71) (−7.95)
GER1 −70.978 ***
(−6.97)
GER12 2374.371 ***
(5.43)
_cons −0.241 *** −0.329 0.563 * −9.337 *** −2.266 * −2.702 *
(−4.05) (−1.36) (1.66) (−8.09) (−1.70) (−1.66)
N 420 420 420 420 420 390
Time fixed effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Provinces and cities fixed effect Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
R2 0.404 0.404 0.425 0.526 0.607 0.504

Notes: t statistics in parentheses; *** p < 0.01, * p < 0.1.