Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;9(10):3367. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103367

Table 4.

Differences in glucose metabolism variables between baseline and follow-up investigations (n = 31).

Characteristic Baseline Follow-Up p-Value
Glucose 0’ (mg/dL) 85 (80–89) 94 (89–103) <0.00001
Glucose 30’ (mg/dL) 131 (123–152) 144 (125–169) 0.02
Glucose 60’ (mg/dL) 108 (91.6–137) 139 (97–166) 0.003
Glucose 120’ (mg/dL) 89 (70.5–102) 100 (88–131) 0.0006
Mean Glucose (mg/dL) 103.25 (91.58–122) 121.00 (99.75–147.25) 0.0005
Matsuda Index 3.64 (1.81–4.97) 3.95 (1.83–5.98) NS
HOMA-IR score 2.65 (1.65–4.57) 2.12 (1.37–4.29) NS
HOMA-%β 222.56 (169.70–346.50) 109.31 (82.33–167.74) <0.00001
Insulinogenic Index 1.81 (1.10–2.65) 1.15 (0.78–2.2) 0.02
Insulin 0’ (µIU/mL) 12.51 (8.66–20.80) 8.64 (6.18–16.75) 0.003
Insulin 30’ (µIU/mL) 100 (68.16–126.37) 70.09 (50.37–111.3) 0.006
Insulin 60’ (µIU/mL) 94 (55.14–159.2) 88.33 (42.41–118.4) NS
Insulin 120’ (µIU/mL) 48.8 (22.76–103.60) 33.57 (25.82–94.52) NS
Mean Insulin (µIU/mL) 64.7 (38.75–102.15) 49.75 (35.62–90.72) NS
Matsuda-IR n (%) 11 (35.4%) 10 (32.2%) NS
HOMA-IR n (%) 17 (54.8%) 13 (41.9%) NS

Data are expressed as median (25–75% quartiles) or numbers (%). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the sign test were used to compare estimated variables at baseline and after follow-up. HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA-%β, homeostasis model assessment of β-cell dysfunction; NS, non-significant.