Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;20(20):5923. doi: 10.3390/s20205923

Table 1.

Calibration of the BA parameters using trial and error method.

Run No. Iteration Number p m e s nep nbp dep dbp Fitness Value
1 20 100 35 10 55 5 5 5 5 0.711
2 20 100 35 10 55 12 5 5 5 0.715
3 20 100 35 10 55 20 5 5 5 0.721
4 20 100 35 10 55 12 12 5 5 0.713
5 20 100 35 10 55 12 20 5 5 0.740
6 20 100 35 10 55 12 20 10 5 0.742
7 20 100 35 10 55 12 20 12 5 0.718
8 20 100 35 10 55 12 20 20 5 0.699
9 20 100 35 10 55 12 20 12 10 0.719
10 20 100 35 10 55 12 20 10 12 0.715
11 20 100 35 10 55 12 20 10 10 0.726
12 20 100 40 5 55 12 20 10 5 0.693
13 20 100 30 15 55 12 20 10 5 0.697
14 20 100 40 10 50 12 20 10 5 0.715
15 20 50 17 5 28 12 20 10 5 0.729
16 20 50 20 5 25 12 20 10 5 0.712
17 20 100 35 10 55 12 20 10 5 0.724
18 50 100 35 10 55 12 20 10 5 0.731
19 70 100 35 10 55 12 20 10 5 0.739
20 100 100 35 10 55 12 20 10 5 0.755 (best)