Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;20(20):5923. doi: 10.3390/s20205923

Table 2.

Calibration of the PSO parameters using trial and error method.

Run No. Iteration Number p w c1 c2 Fitness Value
1 20 100 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.636
2 20 100 0.3 1.5 0.3 0.639
3 20 100 0.3 2 0.3 0.657
4 20 100 0.3 4 0.3 0.665
5 20 100 0.3 4 1.5 0.719
6 20 100 0.3 4 2 0.761
7 20 100 0.3 4 4 0.735
8 20 100 0.3 2 2 0.732
9 20 100 0.3 2.5 2 0.703
10 20 100 0.8 2 2 0.683
11 20 100 0.5 2 2 0.681
12 20 100 0.3 2 2 0.761
13 20 50 0.3 2 2 0.720
14 20 20 0.3 2 2 0.665
15 20 120 0.3 2 2 0.799
16 20 80 0.3 2 2 0.763
17 20 150 0.3 2 2 0.719
18 30 100 0.3 2 2 0.767
19 50 100 0.3 2 2 0.797
20 70 100 0.3 2 2 0.816 (best)