Table 5.

Uncorrected and worst‐case point estimates (Pearson's r) for the optimism meta‐analysis of Boehm et al. (2018)

Model	${\widehat{\mu }}^{\prime }$	CI for ${\widehat{\mu }}^{\prime }$	$\widehat{\tau }$	CI for $\widehat{\tau }$
Uncorrected
Common effect	0.04	[0.03, 0.05]	—	—
Standard†	0.12	[0.06, 0.18]	0.08	[0.00, 0.11]
Robust (independent)	0.12	[0.06, 0.17]	—	—
Robust (clustered)	0.13	[0.07, 0.19]	—	—
Worst case
Common effect	−0.12	[−0.30, 0.08]
Robust (independent)	−0.12	[−0.95, 0.92]
Robust (clustered)	−0.12	[−0.95, 0.92]

†Standard: parametric random‐effects meta‐analysis assuming independence, included for comparison. $\widehat{\tau }$ and its CI are presented on Fisher's z‐scale, the scale on which the data were analysed.