Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 10;7(11):300–308. doi: 10.15698/mic2020.11.735

TABLE 1.

Pairwise comparisons of novobiocin treatment.

Pairwise comparisons of Cq values using t test with non-pooled SD (p value adjustment by Bonferroni).
0 h 24 h 48 h 72 h 96 h 120 h 168 h 192 h 216 h
24 h 1
48 h 0.03843 0.00435
72 h 0.00977 0.00042 0.00221
96 h 0.00637 0.0002 0.0004 0.02576
120 h 0.00033 0.00017 0.00189 0.01182 0.06034
168 h 0.00148 4.10E-05 0.00013 0.00104 0.00646 1
192 h 0.00241 5.30E-05 8.00E-05 0.00069 0.00446 1 1
216 h 0.00152 7.50E-05 0.00048 0.0075 0.15061 0.4254 0.10069 0.11339
240 h 0.00039 0.00162 0.01579 0.1158 0.9473 1 0.84134 1 1
Pairwise comparisons of cell diameters using t test with non-pooled SD (p value adjustment by Bonferroni).
0 h 24 h 48 h 72 h 96 h 120 h 168 h 192 h 216 h
24 h < 2E-16
48 h < 2E-16 3.70E-11
72 h < 2E-16 < 2E-16 4.80E-08
96 h < 2E-16 < 2E-16 9.40E-10 1
120 h < 2E-16 < 2E-16 < 2E-16 0.0014 0.6284
168 h < 2E-16 < 2E-16 1.20E-12 0.0463 1 1
192 h < 2E-16 < 2E-16 < 2E-16 0.0021 1 1 1
216 h < 2E-16 < 2E-16 < 2E-16 6.30E-06 0.0129 1 1 1
240 h < 2E-16 < 2E-16 < 2E-16 0.0002 0.1207 1 1 1 1