TABLE 1.
Pairwise comparisons of novobiocin treatment.
| Pairwise comparisons of Cq values using t test with non-pooled SD (p value adjustment by Bonferroni). | |||||||||
| 0 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 96 h | 120 h | 168 h | 192 h | 216 h | |
| 24 h | 1 | ||||||||
| 48 h | 0.03843 | 0.00435 | |||||||
| 72 h | 0.00977 | 0.00042 | 0.00221 | ||||||
| 96 h | 0.00637 | 0.0002 | 0.0004 | 0.02576 | |||||
| 120 h | 0.00033 | 0.00017 | 0.00189 | 0.01182 | 0.06034 | ||||
| 168 h | 0.00148 | 4.10E-05 | 0.00013 | 0.00104 | 0.00646 | 1 | |||
| 192 h | 0.00241 | 5.30E-05 | 8.00E-05 | 0.00069 | 0.00446 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 216 h | 0.00152 | 7.50E-05 | 0.00048 | 0.0075 | 0.15061 | 0.4254 | 0.10069 | 0.11339 | |
| 240 h | 0.00039 | 0.00162 | 0.01579 | 0.1158 | 0.9473 | 1 | 0.84134 | 1 | 1 |
| Pairwise comparisons of cell diameters using t test with non-pooled SD (p value adjustment by Bonferroni). | |||||||||
| 0 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 96 h | 120 h | 168 h | 192 h | 216 h | |
| 24 h | < 2E-16 | ||||||||
| 48 h | < 2E-16 | 3.70E-11 | |||||||
| 72 h | < 2E-16 | < 2E-16 | 4.80E-08 | ||||||
| 96 h | < 2E-16 | < 2E-16 | 9.40E-10 | 1 | |||||
| 120 h | < 2E-16 | < 2E-16 | < 2E-16 | 0.0014 | 0.6284 | ||||
| 168 h | < 2E-16 | < 2E-16 | 1.20E-12 | 0.0463 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 192 h | < 2E-16 | < 2E-16 | < 2E-16 | 0.0021 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 216 h | < 2E-16 | < 2E-16 | < 2E-16 | 6.30E-06 | 0.0129 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 240 h | < 2E-16 | < 2E-16 | < 2E-16 | 0.0002 | 0.1207 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |