Table 6.
Analysis of the health effects of toner exposure with adjustment for confounders (model 4)
| Parameters (unit) | Difference in yearly change in each parameter between the low-concentration toner exposure group and non-toner-handling group | Difference in yearly change in each parameter between the high-concentration toner exposure group and non-toner-handling group | Yearly change in each parameter of the non-toner-handling group | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | 95% CI | P-value | Estimate | 95% CI | P-value | Estimate | 95% CI | P-value | AIC | ||||
| Respiratory function tests | |||||||||||||
| VC (l) | −0.001 | −0.004 | 0.002 | 0.378 | −0.005 | −0.01 | 0.002 | 0.159 | −0.007 | −0.01 | − 0.005 | < 0.001 | − 5278.0 |
| %VC (%) | − 0.03 | −0.10 | 0.03 | 0.284 | −0.2 | −0.3 | − 0.003 | 0.045 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | < 0.001 | 73,413.9 |
| FEV1 (l) | 0.0001 | −0.002 | 0.002 | 0.954 | −0.001 | −0.007 | 0.005 | 0.824 | −0.02 | −0.02 | − 0.02 | < 0.001 | − 9973.4 |
| %FEV1 (%) | 0.02 | −0.05 | 0.08 | 0.614 | 0.01 | −0.2 | 0.2 | 0.898 | 0.1 | 0.09 | 0.2 | < 0.001 | 74,937.0 |
| FEV1/FVC (%) | 0.001 | −0.04 | 0.04 | 0.964 | 0.05 | −0.05 | 0.1 | 0.325 | −0.3 | −0.3 | − 0.3 | < 0.001 | 60,386.6 |
| %FEV1/FVC (%) | 0.01 | −0.04 | 0.06 | 0.670 | 0.10 | −0.02 | 0.23 | 0.108 | −0.09 | −0.1 | − 0.05 | < 0.001 | 65,542.2 |
| V25 (l/s) | 0.001 | −0.003 | 0.005 | 0.640 | 0.002 | −0.007 | 0.01 | 0.448 | −0.03 | −0.03 | − 0.03 | < 0.001 | 3479.7 |
| %V25 (%) | 0.02 | −0.2 | 0.2 | 0.861 | 0.2 | −0.3 | 0.6 | 0.470 | −0.4 | −0.6 | − 0.3 | < 0.001 | 10,1016.2 |
| Biomarkers | |||||||||||||
| CRP (mg/dl) | 0.0002 | −0.003 | 0.003 | 0.876 | 0.002 | −0.005 | 0.010 | 0.558 | 0.0004 | −0.2 | −0.08 | 0.717 | 3589.0 |
| Ig E (IU/ml) | 4.9 | −1.0 | 10.7 | 0.106 | 3.5 | −12.4 | 19.4 | 0.206 | −1.6 | −6.1 | 3.0 | 0.500 | 17,4511.9 |
| 8-OHdG/Creatinine (ng/mg) | −0.01 | −0.03 | 0.006 | 0.898 | 0.003 | −0.04 | 0.04 | 0.758 | 0.033 | 0.02 | 0.05 | < 0.001 | 44,987.9 |
In model 4, dependent variables consisted of the parameters of respiratory function tests and the values of biomarkers. We compared the high-concentration toner exposure group, low-concentration toner exposure group, and non-toner-handling group and adjusted the model using age at baseline, body mass index, smoking, asthma, allergic rhinitis, pneumonia, sinusitis, non-toner-handling work, and organic solvent-handling work as confounding factors
CI confidence interval, AIC Akaike’s Information Criterion, VC vital capacity, %VC percentage of VC to predicted VC value, FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 s, %FEV1 percentage of FEV1 to predicted FEV1 value, FEV1/FVC percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 s, %FEV1/FVC percentage of FEV1/FVC to predicted FEV1/FVC value, V25 maximal expiratory flow at 25% forced VC, CRP C-reactive protein, IgE immunoglobulin E, 8-OHdG 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine