Table 3.
Results of enter multivariate logistic regression model analysis
| Variable | P-value | OR | CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land cover | |||
| Condensed and Semi condensed forest | < 0.001 | ||
| Mean humidity | 0.072 | 1.073 | 0.994–1.158 |
| Slope | 0.881 | 1.003 | 0.964–1.043 |
| Sparse forest | 0.789 | 1.363 | 0.140–13.264 |
| Condensed and Semi-condensed rangeland | 0.276 | 3.298 | 0.385–28.216 |
| Thin rangeland | 0.213 | 3.368 | 0.474–28.631 |
| Dry (rainfed) farm | 0.081 | 7.468 | 0.782–71.332 |
| Irrigated farm | 0.050 | 7.460 | 0.969–57.431 |
| Urban | < 0.001 | 67.646 | 8.371–546.632 |
| Salt land, salinity and water area | 0.144 | 5.205 | 0.570–47.571 |
| 2 km buffer around NTR | 0.156 | 1.384 | 0.883–2.168 |
| 5 km buffer around NTR | 0.981 | 1.006 | 0.595–1.701 |
| Livestock density | 0.558 | 0.440 | 0.028–6.856 |
| Sheep density | 0.906 | 1.000 | 0.996–1.004 |
| Cattle density | 0.007 | 1.203 | 1.006–1.041 |
| Camel density | 0.801 | 1.251 | 0.220–7.103 |
| Dog density | 0.037 | 1.944 | 1.040–3.636 |