Table 4. Did each analysis replicate the corresponding effects from the original study [16] and Frimer and Skitka’s [18] reinterpretation in terms of the estimated effect overlap criterion? Numbers in brackets represent 95% confidence interval estimates of the dinner shortening effect of political diversity (in minutes).
| Sample | Chen & Rohla [16] | Frimer & Skitka [18] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zero Order | Partial | Zero Order | Partial | ||
| [-24, -19] | [-70, -35] | [-5, -4] | [-14, -7] | ||
| Study 1 (Trump Approval) | All | yes | no | yes | yes |
| 5 mins | yes | yes | yes | yes | |
| 1 min | yes | yes | yes | yes | |
| Study 2 (Trump Approval) | All | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| 5 mins | yes | yes | yes | yes | |
| Study 2 (Impeachment) | All | yes | yes | yes | no |
| 5 mins | yes | yes | yes | yes | |
| Study 2 (Party) | All | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| 5 mins | yes | yes | yes | yes | |
| Mega-Analysis | All | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Replication Success Rate | 100% | 90% | 100% | 90% | |
Samples are either all participants or restricted to those that were confident about their reported arrival and departure time to within 5 minutes or 1 minute.