Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 27;37(4):965–972. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01907-x

Table 1.

Characteristics of LORs and letter writer by applicant gender

Female applicants Male applicants P value
Applicant characteristics
Total number of applicants; N (%) 60 (48%) 65 (52%)
Letters per applicant; N (%) 0.49
Three 8 (13.3) 6 (9.2)
Four 52 (86.7) 58 (89.2)
Five 0 (0) 1 (1.5)
Applicants per application cycle; N (%) 0.56
2015/2016 10 (16.7) 17 (26.2)
2016/2017 19 (31.7) 16 (24.6)
2017/2018 14 (23.3) 16 (24.6)
2018/2019 17 (28.3) 16 (24.6)
PhD Degree; N (%) 12 (20.0) 20 (30.8) 0.17
Underrepresented in Medicine1; N (%) 0.24
Yes 5 (8.3) 9 (13.8)
No 47 (78.3) 42(64.6)
Unknown/did not disclose 8 (13.3) 14 (21.5)
Letter characteristics
Total number of letters; N (%) 232 255
Gender of each letter’s writer*; N (%) <.01
Female 79 (34.1) 58 (22.7)
Male 153 (65.9) 197 (77.3)
Professional field of letter writer; N (%) 0.93
Radiation oncology 180 (77.6) 197 (77.3)
Other 52 (22.4) 58 (22.7)
Academic rank of letter writer; N (%) 0.08
Assistant professor 58 (25.0) 49 (19.2)
Associate professor 53 (22.8) 70 (27.5)
Professor 104 (44.8) 127 (49.8)
Unknown 17 (7.3) 9 (3.5)
Institutional affiliation of letter writer; N (%) 0.15
Home program 141 (60.8) 171 (67.1)
Away program 91 (39.2) 84 (32.9)

1Self identified as Black/African American and/or Hispanic/Latino within ERAS

*In cases of dual or departmental authorship, the gender of the first listed author was used