Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 17;43(11):1641–1649. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02612-4

Table 2.

Screening for abscopal effects after radioembolization

Comparison of untreated metastases in MRI 1 (baseline) and MRI 2 (follow-up after first RE)
RECIST 1.0 (96 patients) Response of lesions (765 checked for AE)
Complete response (CR) 0 Complete response—0 metastases
Partial response (PR) 2 Shrinkage > 30%—6 metastases (2 patients)
Stable disease (SD) 35 Shrinkage < 30%—2 metastases (2 patients)
Progressive disease (PD) 61 No shrinkage or progression – 757 metastases
Patients with PR
Patient A (compare Fig. 2) (female, age 43, BCA)

04/2010—initial diagnosis of bilateral breast cancer

12/2013—first detection of liver metastases (ER +,  PR +, Her2neu-)

Endocrine therapy with Tamoxifen und GnRH analogues

Decision for radioembolization due to progressive hepatic disease

10/2015 radioembolization of the right liver lobe + S4b (1270 MBq)

Abscopal effect registered (acquisition of MRI2 42 days after MRI1 and 43 days after first RE)

11/2015 radioembolization of the left liver lobe (640 MBq)

5/16 stable disease

Lost in further follow-up

Shrinkage of metatsases (mm) MRI1 MRI2
18 19 31 14 14 19
Patient B (compare Fig. 3) (male, age 65, Prostate CA)

03/1995—initial diagnosis of prostate cancer

01/2002—first detection of liver metastases

chemotherapy cycles with: estramustine, docetaxel, capecitabine, imatinib – until 04/2005

06/2005—11/2006 multiple local ablations (interstitial brachytherapy) of liver metastases

11/2007 radioembolization of the right liver lobe (850 MBq)

Questionable Abscopal effect registered (acquisition of MRI2 42 days after MRI1 and 43 days after first RE)

01/2008 radioembolization of the left liver lobe (400 MBq)

09/2008 deceased

Shrinkage of metatsases (mm) MRI1 MRI2
10 20 24 28 34 10 14 24 21 27