Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 24;38(11):1036–1045. doi: 10.1007/s11604-020-01008-1

Table 3.

Detection of the IT and ULP on non-ECG-gated CTA, single-diastolic-phase ECG-gated CTA, and full-phase ECG-gated CTA in each anatomical segment

Non-ECG-gated CTA Single-diastolic-phase ECG-gated CTA Full-phase ECG-gated CTA P value* P value P value
Ascending aorta (n = 25)
 Accuracy 72 (90, 54) 76 (93, 60) 88 (100, 75) 0.65 0.18 0.16
 Sensitivity 54 (81, 27) 69 (94, 44) 100 (100, 100)
 Specificity 92 (100, 76) 83 (100, 62) 75 (100, 51)
Aortic arch (n = 37)
 Accuracy 86 (98, 75) 92 (100, 83) 95 (100, 87) 0.31 0.31 0.083
 Sensitivity 50 (90, 10) 50 (90, 10) 67 (100, 29)
 Specificity 94 (100, 85) 100 (100, 100) 100 (100, 100)
Proximal descending aorta (n = 71)
 Accuracy 69 (80, 58) 75 (85, 65) 86 (94, 78) 0.005 0.31 0.005
 Sensitivity 60 (79, 41) 56 (75, 37) 84 (98, 70)
 Specificity 74 (87, 61) 85 (95, 74) 87 (97, 77)
Distal descending aorta (n = 71)
 Accuracy 89 (96, 81) 92 (98, 85) 90 (97, 83) 0.53 0.56 0.74
 Sensitivity 80 (100, 55) 90 (100, 71) 90 (100, 76)
 Specificity 90 (98, 83) 92 (99, 85) 90 (98, 83)

Data are presented as percentages with 95% confidence intervals, unless otherwise indicated

IT intimal tear, ULP ulcer-like projection, ECG electrocardiogram, CTA CT angiography, AD aortic dissection, IMH intramural hematoma

*Non-ECG-gated CTA vs single-diastolic-phase ECG-gated CTA

Single-diastolic-phase ECG-gated CTA vs full-phase ECG-gated CTA

Non-ECG-gated CTA vs full-phase ECG-gated CTA