Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 14;12:574214. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.574214

TABLE 1.

Accuracy and reaction time in CH-NATs vs. CH-PATs.

CH-NAT
CH-PAT
P-value Pooled SD Cohen’s d
Ave (SD) Max K-S value* Ave (SD) Max K-S value*
0-back
ACC 0.90 (0.06) 0.17 0.88 (0.06) 0.17 0.441 0.06 −0.33
RT (ms) 574.45 (96.40) 0.1 559.73 (63.23) 0.12 0.679 81.52 −0.18
2-back
ACC 0.82 (0.07) 0.11 0.75 (0.09) 0.15 0.029 0.08 −0.87
RT (ms) 865.35 (128.02) 0.19 836.85 (132.36) 0.09 0.602 130.21 −0.22

The mean accuracy (ACC) and mean reaction time (RT) were calculated for both CH-NATs and CH-PATs. There is no significant difference in 0-back for both ACC and RT however, during 2-back CH-NATs performed significantly better than CH-PATs. P-values with < 0.05 are in bold italics to denote significance (Baddeley, 1998b). * K-S values are based on (α = 0.05 critical value of 0.41. SD standard deviation; K-S, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.