Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 12;123(9):1437–1444. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-1024-2

Table 3.

Concordance of dEGFR39 for plasma EGFR mutations compared to ARMS.

Mutant type Patient count PPA
(95% CI)
NPA
(95% CI)
OPA
(95% CI)
TP FN TN FP
L858R/L861Q 6 0 26 1

100

60.97–100%

96.29

81.72–99.34%

96.97

84.68–99.46%

S768I 7 1 25 0

85.71

52.91–97.76%

100

86.68–100%

96.97

84.68–99.46%

G719X 1 0 32 0

100

20.65–100%

100

89.28–100%

100

89.57–100%

19Del 0 0 33 0 NA

100

89.57–100%

100

89.57–100%

20ins 1 0 32 0

100

20.65–100%

100

89.28–100%

100

89.57–100%

T790M 3 0 28 2

100

43.85–100%

93.33

78.68–98.15%

93.94

80.39–98.32%

Overall 15 1 14 3

9375.00

71.67–98.89%

82.35

58.97–93.81%

87.88

72.67–95.18%

TP true positive, FN false negative, TN true negative, FP false positive, PPA positive predict agreement, NPA negative predict agreement, OPA overall predict agreement, CI confidence interval.