Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 31;60(10):4518–4535. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00464

Table 3. Comparison of DFT Calculations Performed on Our 76 Material Candidates by Structural Typea.

type no. candidates |δbonds| (%) Ef| (eV/atom) |δcell| (%)
perovskites 30 5.23 0.57 0
Heusler 22 1.44 3.34 0
binaries 24 10.88 2.65 0
a

The geometry-optimized DFT results were compared against their cognate VAE-generated crystal structures. Results are analyzed in terms of difference in the absolute in formation energy, |ΔEf|, mean absolute percentage change in bond lengths, |Δbonds|, and unit-cell parameters, |Δcell|.