Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 28.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Community Psychol. 2018 Mar 25;61(3-4):332–343. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12240

Table 2.

Regression model coefficients for community support and attachment.

Model 1 Model 2

Community Support Community Attachment
Male .18 (.17) .34* (.17)
Age .00 (.01) .00 (.01)
Afghan −.13 (.24) .28 (.24)
African −.45 (.31) .12 (.31)
Education .02 (.05) .05 (.05)
  Less Than High School .05 (.25) .11 (.24)
  High School Graduate −.17 (.25) .02 (.24)
Intervention Group −.05 (.16) −.10 (.16)
Acculturation −.09 (.14) −.35* (.15)
Internalizing Symptoms .08 (.14) −.12 (.14)
Has Child .04 (.05) .04 (.06)
Employed .09 (.19) −.07 (.19)
English Proficiency −.17 (.16) −.16 (.16)
Has Access to Automobile −.07 (.21) −.20 (.20)
Transportation Difficulty −.04 (.08) −.03 (.08)
Time in Receiving City .00 (.00) .00 (.00)
Non-Ethnic Community Support .29** (.10) .25* (.10)
Family Support .37** (.10) .50** (.11)
Residential Distance .01 (.05) .05 (.05)
No Reported Activities .63 (.49) .48 (.47)
Number of Activities .03 (.04) .02 (.04)
Extensity .36* (.18) .31+ (.18)
Intercept −.26 (.71) .41 (.71)
+

p<.10,

*

p<.05,

**

p<.01