Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 27;94(22):e00704-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00704-20

TABLE 1.

Backbone structure and proline mutant analysis of antigenic domain D residues

Residue no. Wild-type residue Backbone angle (°)a
Backbone analysisa
Rosetta proline ΔΔGb
Φ Ψ Pro Pre-Pro
437 Trp −73.66 −18.28 Yes No 0.5
438 Leu −59.18 −59.67 Yes No 0.3
439 Ala −59.14 −37.12 Yes Yes 0
440 Gly −56.62 −26.31 Yes Yes 0.1
441 Leu −68.3 −40.87 Yes Yes 2.1
442 Phe −80.55 −40.18 Yes Yes 2.7
443 Tyr −159.11 143.78 No Yes 2.5
444 Gln −110.46 128.63 No Yes 2.2
445 His −58.15 153.22 Yes Yes 0
a

Values and proline backbone analysis were obtained from the Ramachandran plot analysis web server (https://zlab.umassmed.edu/bu/rama/) (54). Pre-Pro assessments correspond to preproline Ramachandran plot conformation for the backbone of the preceding residue. Unfavorable Pro or preproline conformations are noted in boldface.

b

Predicted binding energy change for proline epitope mutant to the HC84.26.5D HMAb, based on the X-ray structure of the complex (PDB code 4Z0X) and computational mutagenesis in Rosetta (55). Predicted destabilizing values (>0.5 in Rosetta energy units) are indicated in boldface.