Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 28;15(10):e0239914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239914

Table 1. Baseline demographics and experience with menstruation.

(1)
Boys
(2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Girls
(7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
Diff.
Panel A: continuous variables Mean SD Min Max N Mean SD Min Max N
Demographics
Age (years) 15.92 1.58 13 22 382 15.21 1.52 10 22 458 -0.71***
Grade (secondary school 1-3) 1.76 0.75 1 3 423 1.71 0.72 1 3 503 -0.05
Duration of residence (years) 9.46 5.53 0 19 402 7.28 5.78 0 19 447 -2.18***
Monthly expenditure (1000s THS) 21.10 30.64 0 300 334 6.67 17.34 0 300 361 -14.43***
Menstrual knowledge and peer teasing
Menstrual knowledge score index 0.60 0.19 0 1 432 0.61 0.16 0 1 524 0.01
No. male friends observed teasing 0.37 0.99 0 5 419 . . . . . .
Panel B: binary variables (no = 0, yes = 1) Share Yes [95% CI] N Share Yes [95% CI] N
Information on menstruation
Someone has told me about periods 0.79 0.75 0.83 417 0.90 0.87 0.93 448 0.11***
Received information from:
school curricula 0.63 0.57 0.68 355 0.76 0.71 0.80 350 0.13***
health worker 0.59 0.54 0.65 355 0.80 0.75 0.83 396 0.20***
informational pamphlet 0.30 0.24 0.36 255 0.45 0.39 0.51 297 0.15***
Internet 0.26 0.21 0.31 325 0.40 0.35 0.46 323 0.14***
Boys’ attitudes: Agree that girls…
should get married after menarche 0.05 0.03 0.07 327 . . . . .
are ready for sex after menarche 0.32 0.27 0.37 320 . . . . .
Boys’ period teasing
Has teased girls 0.18 0.15 0.22 403 . . . . .
Girls’ period teasing
Ever been teased about periods . . . . 0.13 0.10 0.17 486 .
Afraid of teasing: leaking . . . . 0.80 0.76 0.83 441 .
Afraid of teasing: odor . . . . 0.87 0.84 0.90 435 .
Number of participants 432 524

Notes: Welch test for unequal variance between groups in column 11.

* p < 0.10,

** p < 0.05,

*** p < 0.01.

Knowledge score index is the proportion of 10 questions about biological facts of menstruation answered correctly by the respondent. Given the skew distribution of monthly expenditure, we checked robustness of the significant gender difference by performing a t-test on natural log of monthly expenditure. The result still holds (p < 0.01).