Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 24;10(20):11192–11216. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6761

Table 4.

Distribution of the major cognitive sets referred to walnut term (*HwV́rƛ̣V, *ḳV̆rḳV, *ṭVɫV, *a‐/an‐gōza, *KVrV, *ŋuńV‐) and chestnut term (*q̇wăɫV́, *blwt, *dʷirV, *kastAno‐) across the genetic clusters of walnut and chestnut populations inferred by SSR markers

Walnut cognitive sets
Walnut Clusters a *HwV́rƛ̣V *ḳV̆rḳV *ṭVɫV *a‐/an‐gōza *KVrV *ŋuńV‐
1 (n = 10) 2 (20%) 2 (20%) 2 (20%) 9 (90%) 4 (40%) 1 (10%)
2 (n = 12) 0 0 0 0 0 11 (91.7%)
3 (n = 10) 0 0 0 0 0 10 (100%)
Admixed 2 × 3 (n = 8) 0 0 0 1 (12.5%) 1 (12.5%) 8 (100%)
4 (n = 45) 0 0 0 10 (22.2%) 1 (2.22%) 34 (75.6%)
Admixed 1 × 4 (n = 10) 0 0 0 0 6 (100%) 0
χ2 (df = 5) 42.3 42.3 42.3 26.4 36.9 25.2
P < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Chestnut cognitive sets
Chestnut Clusters a *q̇wăɫV́ *blwt *dʷirV *kastAno‐
1 (n = 47) 2 (4.26%) 0 0 47 (100%)
2 (n = 17) 0 0 4 (23.6%) 17 (100%)
3 (n = 17) 0 1 (5.89%) 7 (41.2%) 11 (64.7%)
Admixed 2 × 3 (n = 3) 0 0 3 (100%) 3 (100%)
χ2 (df = 3) 40.2 42.1 27.7 30.1
p <.001 <.001 <.001 <.001

The number of populations (n) included in each genetic cluster was reported in brackets. Statistically significant difference in distribution (Chi‐squared test) was reported for each cognate set.

a

The expected numbers of populations are computed under the hypothesis of priori probability equal to 0.5.