Abstract
Agitation and aggression are common in older emergency department (ED) patients, can impede the expedient diagnosis of potentially life‐threatening conditions, and can adversely impact ED functioning and efficiency. Agitation and aggression in older adults may be due to multiple causes, but chief among them are primary psychiatric disorders, substance use, hyperactive delirium, and symptoms of dementia. Understanding the etiology of agitation in an older adult is critical to proper management. Effective non‐pharmacologic modalities are available for the management of mild to moderate agitation and aggression in patients with dementia. Pharmacologic management is indicated for agitation related to a psychiatric condition, severe agitation where a patient is at risk to harm self or others, and to facilitate time‐sensitive diagnostic imaging, procedures, and treatment. Emergency physicians have several pharmacologic agents at their disposal, including opioid and non‐opioid analgesics, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, ketamine, and combination agents. Emergency physicians should be familiar with geriatric‐specific dosing, contraindications, and common adverse effects of these agents. This review article discusses the common causes and non‐pharmacologic and pharmacologic management of agitation in older adults, with a specific focus on dementia, delirium, and pain.
Keywords: aggression, altered mental status, delirium, dementia, emergency medicine, older adult
1. INTRODUCTION
Agitation and aggression in older adults may be the primary reason an older adult is brought to the emergency department for medical care or may develop in response to the ED environment or underlying medical causes. The causes of agitation in older adults are multiple and can overlap, including exacerbations of behavioral and psychiatric symptoms in dementia, hyperactive delirium, manifestations of underlying psychiatric disease, and the result of alcohol or other intoxicating substances. In the coming decades, we can expect emergency physicians to care for increasing numbers of agitated older adults as the number of individuals over the age of 65 increases to nearly 98 million, constituting one‐quarter of the US population by 2060. 1 Agitation is particularly common among patients with dementia, 2 , 3 , 4 a population that is expected to double over the next 3 decades 5 and has disproportionately higher ED utilization. 6 To provide high‐value care to these populations, emergency physicians need to understand the causes and management of agitation in older adults. The purpose of this paper is to review the key causes of agitation in older adults and provide tips for its management, with a focus on geriatric syndromes.
2. CAUSES OF AGITATION IN OLDER ADULTS
When approaching an undifferentiated older ED patient who is agitated, aggressive, or displays features of psychosis, key considerations include determining whether the patient has a pre‐existing psychiatric condition or known dementia, and obtaining collateral information regarding whether there has been an acute onset of behavioral disturbances and/or fluctuations in behavior. Less than 1% of individuals over the age of 65 have schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorders and new‐onset primary psychotic disorders are exceedingly rare in older adults. 7 , 8 However, up to 50% of persons living with dementia display paranoia or hallucinations 7 and most demonstrate behavioral and psychiatric symptoms in dementia. 2 , 3 , 4 Intoxication with alcohol is common among older adults with 9% qualifying as binge drinkers and 2% as heavy drinkers. 9 Intoxication with alcohol and/or other substances should therefore be considered in the differential of agitation. 10
2.1. Dementia
Currently, ∼5.8 million people over the age of 65 are living with Alzheimer's disease, and the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease is expected to more than double to 13.8 million by 2050. 5 Behavioral and psychiatric symptoms in dementias exhibited by persons living with dementia include aggression, agitation, delusions, hallucinations, anxiety, wandering, and apathy. These symptoms are estimated to impact up to 90% of people with Alzheimer's disease 2 , 3 , 4 and behavioral and psychiatric symptoms in dementias are a defining feature of other dementias. For example, Lewy body dementia is characterized by visual hallucinations and frontotemporal dementia by behavioral disinhibition and apathy. 4 , 11 Behavioral and psychiatric symptoms in dementias are more common in individuals with more advanced dementia and are associated with decline in functional abilities, increased caregiver burden, and risk for abuse and neglect. 2 , 12 Up to 46% of patients with Alzheimer's disease will exhibit aggressive behaviors, including verbal abuse, threatening gestures, and physical destructiveness. 12 One‐third of persons living with dementia will display aberrant motor activity, such as pacing and fidgeting. 4 Resistance to care is also common among persons living with dementia. 7
For caregivers of persons living with dementia who display psychotic symptoms or agitation, increased caregiver distress is associated with increased ED use, hospitalization, and healthcare‐related expenditures, and caregiver distress may be the primary reason a person living with dementia presents to the ED. 13 Alternatively, a patient may be newly agitated, aggressive, or psychotic as a result of the ED setting or due to delirium precipitated by an acute illness. 2 , 7 , 14 , 15 Dementia can impact both receptive and expressive communication abilities; accordingly, anxiety, agitation, and aggressive behavior are mechanisms by which a person living with dementia may communicate pain, fear, boredom, overstimulation by the physical environment of the ED, or an unmet need such as hunger, thirst, or the need for toileting. 16
2.2. Delirium
Delirium affects between 7% and 20% of older ED patients, is independently associated with higher mortality, and, in survivors, results in accelerated functional and cognitive decline. 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 Delirium is characterized by acute disturbances in attention, awareness, and other components of cognition that develop over a short period of time and fluctuate over the course of the day. 22 There are a number of diagnostic and screening tools available for use in the ED, 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 all of which include formal tests of attention as inattention is one of the defining features of delirium. Nonetheless, delirium is missed in the ED in up to 67% to 75% of cases. 27 , 28 This is in part due to the short duration of time during which emergency physicians interact with patients, making it difficult to note fluctuations in mental status. Additionally, patients who have dementia are 2‐ to 3‐fold more likely to experience delirium in the setting of acute illness. 14 , 21 , 29 , 30 In persons living with dementia, it is challenging, and at times impossible, to diagnose delirium in the ED without collateral information from a family member or caregiver about whether there has been an acute change or fluctuations in a patient's cognition.
Delirium occurs in 3 main psychomotor subtypes: hypoactive, hyperactive, and mixed. Patients with hypoactive delirium tend to be quiet, somnolent, and remain still in the bed. Patients with hyperactive delirium, which accounts for 10% of delirium among older ED patients, 30 may be agitated and restless, may fidget and pull covers off, or get up from their bed. Some patients with delirium have hallucinations or delusions that may be confused for a psychotic disorder or behavioral and psychiatric symptoms in dementia. 31 The key to differentiating a primary psychotic disorder, delirium, and dementia lies in the time course of the illness. Additionally, many individuals with dementia or primary psychiatric conditions can sustain attention during formal tests of attention whereas individuals with delirium cannot.
2.3. Primary psychiatric disorders
When assessing an older patient with agitation, primary psychiatric causes must not be overlooked. Anxiety disorders are the most prevalent psychiatric disorder among older adults, occurring at a rate of 10% in the community 32 and up to 28% of older individuals in a medical setting. 33 Acute anxiety can present with signs of agitation including restlessness, pacing, irritability, and verbal agitation. Individuals with psychotic symptoms such as delusions, paranoia, hallucinations, or disorganized behavior and thought process may also be agitated. Though schizophrenia is relatively uncommon in older adults, occurring at a rate of 0.1%–0.5%, the absolute number of older adults living with schizophrenia is increasing due to improved life‐expectancy and population growth. 8 , 32 Mood‐related psychoses, such as psychotic depression or mania, are a more common cause of psychosis in older adults in the ED, after dementia and delirium. 15 Older ED patients with depression should be evaluated for suicidality, as suicide rates for men are highest among those 75 years of age or older. 34 In the evaluation of an agitated older ED patient, it is important to assess for primary psychiatric disorders through clinical interview, chart review, and collateral gathering, as this knowledge is critical to appropriate and effective emergency care.
3. MANAGING AGITATION IN OLDER ADULTS
When approaching an agitated older patient, the safety of the patient, staff, other patients and visitors is paramount. When clinical circumstances dictate rapid management of the agitation, such as when the patient is at imminent risk of harm to self or others, the patient should be treated pharmacologically (described below) (Figure 1; Table 1). When time and clinical circumstances permit, emergency physicians should try to determine whether the patient has acute delirium, dementia with behavioral and psychiatric symptoms in dementia, or a primary psychiatric condition, treat accordingly and consider non‐pharmacological methods to manage agitation (described below).
FIGURE 1.

Potential framework to guide selection of pharmacologic agent to manage agitation in older emergency department patients. IM, intramuscular; IV, intravenous; PO, per os/by mouth; SL, sublingual
TABLE 1.
Common medications used in the treatment of pain or agitation in older adults, recommend geriatric dosing, and geriatric‐specific considerations
| Medication | Recommended dose and route | Time to onset (min) | Considerations and precautions in older adults |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pain | |||
| Lidocaine 4%–5% patch | 1 patch | 240 |
|
| Acetaminophen | 650–1000 mg PO | 60 |
|
| Ibuprofen | 200–400 mg PO | 30–60 |
|
| Morphine |
|
|
|
| Fentanyl | 25–50 mcg IV | Immediate |
|
| Hydromorphone |
|
|
|
| Oxycodone | 2.5 mg PO | 10–15 |
|
| Agitation | |||
| Droperidol | 5 mg IM | 5–10 |
|
| Haloperidol |
|
|
|
| Risperidone | 0.25–1 mg PO | 30–120 |
|
| Ziprasidone | 10–20 mg IM | 15–30 |
|
| Olanzapine |
|
|
|
| Quetiapine | 12.5–25 mg PO | 30–120 |
|
| Lorazepam |
|
|
|
| Midazolam | 2.5–5 mg IM | 10–15 |
|
ADE, adverse drug effects; BPSD, behavioral and psychiatric symptoms in dementia; CNS, central nervous system; IM, intramuscular; IV, intravenous; OTC, over the counter; PO, per os/by mouth; SL, sublingual. 60 , 62 , 66 , 68 , 69 , 73 , 74 , 102 , 103 , 104
In the United States, for parenteral use haloperidol and olanzapine are FDA approved for IM administration only; IV administration of these agents is considered off‐label, although may have similar safety profiles.
3.1. Dementia
Anxiety, agitation, and aggressive behavior may be a mechanism by which a person living with dementia expresses pain, fear, overstimulation, boredom, or unmet needs. 16 The first steps in addressing mild or moderate agitation in a person living with dementia are to identify contributing factors and offer non‐pharmacologic mitigation. When available, a family member or caregiver who demonstrates a calming presence should be encouraged to remain with the patient to provide reassurance and redirection and help staff understand and better manage behavioral disturbances. In older patients with cognitive impairment, traditional descriptive and numeric scales can underreport pain and lead to under‐treatment. Observational methods, such as the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale, can be used to assess for pain in patients with advanced dementia (Table 2). 35 In patients with concomitant vision or hearing impairment, sensory augmentation using hearing amplifiers or glasses can be offered. Patients who are bored may benefit from diversional activities, such as reading material, coloring activities, or puzzles. Functional ability and cognitive status should be considered in selecting activities. Patients with advanced dementia may have difficulty with puzzles or coloring activities but may find diversional activities such as towel folding soothing. 16 , 36 Providing activities may also re‐direct fidgeting behaviors, such as picking at intravenous catheters. Other inexpensive non‐pharmacologic options that can mitigate fidgeting behaviors include card shuffling, fidget sensory tools, and aprons, 36 , 37 , 38 as well as protective sleeves that cover the intravenous site. Sensory stimulation, including music and light therapy, may be used to ameliorate agitation in persons living with dementia and can be feasibly implemented at low cost in the ED setting 36 , 37 (Figure 2), although evidence of efficacy in the ED is lacking due to absence of research.
TABLE 2.
The Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale 35 : an observational pain scale for use in individuals with dementia
| Item | Score = 0 | Score = 1 | Score = 2 | Sum of scores |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breathing independent of vocalization | Normal |
|
|
|
| Negative vocalization | None |
|
|
|
| Facial expression | Smiling or inexpressive |
|
|
|
| Body language | Relaxed |
|
|
|
| Consolability | No need to console |
|
|
|
| Total score range: 0–10 |
Mild pain: score 1–3; moderate pain: score 4–6; severe pain: score 7–10
FIGURE 2.

Example of a therapeutic activity kit for patients with dementia in the emergency department or on inpatient wards 36 (courtesy of Jennifer Ricker and Maureen Mulligan)
3.2. Delirium
Once the diagnosis of delirium is made or suspected in a patient, it is important to look for an underlying cause. 39 , 40 Delirium can occur due to environmental factors, such as a new living environment or lack of visual or hearing aids, but it most often has an underlying medical cause such as dehydration, electrolyte disorders, infection, medication side effects or interactions, cardiovascular disorders, neurological problems, and trauma. The search for an underlying cause should start with a thorough history, gathering of collateral information, and a careful physical exam. The diagnostic workup should be guided by the findings on the history and physical. When the history and physical do not yield a clear cause, it is reasonable to cast a broad net including an electrocardiogram and laboratory tests including a complete blood count, complete metabolic panel, and urinalysis; neuroimaging should be reserved for patients with signs of trauma, focal neurologic deficit, somnolence, and/or on anticoagulation. 40
Once the precipitating causes are identified, they should be treated or managed accordingly. Other factors that may worsen delirium can also be addressed, such as pain, hunger, urinary retention, and constipation. 41 By normalizing body functions, treating pain, and providing hearing and vision aids, it may be possible to prevent the worsening of delirium. Non‐pharmacologic approaches, including distraction, reassurance and verbal de‐escalation, are first line for managing agitated and aggressive behaviors in delirious patients. 40 Pharmacologic management of agitation should be reserved for those at immediate risk of harming themselves or others, as these medications do not improve delirium duration or severity. 42 , 43 The ADEPT Tool, published by American College of Emergency Physicians, provides quick tips for the assessment, diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of delirium and can be easily accessed by smartphone, tablet, or computer. 40 , 44
3.3. Primary psychiatric conditions
If other medical etiologies are ruled out and agitation is related to the exacerbation of a primary psychiatric condition, pharmacological management should be guided by the patient's existing psychiatric medication regimen or medications that have been previously effective for the patient, if known. In general, second‐generation antipsychotics are preferred for patients with a primary psychotic disorder or mood disorder with psychotic features. 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 Although benzodiazepines are generally avoided in older adults due to side effect profile, use of a low‐dose short‐acting benzodiazepine for the anxious agitated patient may be appropriate, particularly in patients already prescribed benzodiazepines. 49 , 50 , 51 The rapid identification and management of agitated behavior before escalation to aggression is critical to ensure patient and staff safety. In cases of agitation due to decompensation of primary psychiatric disorders, consultation with emergency psychiatric providers is recommended; however, this should not delay appropriate initial pharmacologic management. If the suspicion for a primary psychiatric condition is high, but no corroborating information is available, selection of pharmacological agent may follow our algorithm for the undifferentiated patient (Figure 1).
4. PHARMACOLOGIC MANAGEMENT OF AGITATION
There are many pharmacologic agents emergency physicians can use to manage agitation and aggression in older adults. It is important that emergency physicians understand geriatric‐specific dosing of, indications for, and common adverse drug effects associated with these agents. This article focuses on agents that are familiar to and frequently used by emergency physicians.
4.1. Pharmacokinetic considerations
When medications are required to manage agitation in older ED patients, emergency physicians should be aware of age‐related physiologic changes that impact dose selection and titration. Renal and hepatic clearance is altered by age‐related decreases in organ perfusion and a decrease in number of nephrons in the kidneys, which in turn result in increased bioavailability and accumulation of certain drugs. 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 Aging also causes diminished muscle mass, lower total body water, and an increase in fat content, which impact the volume of distribution for hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs. 53 , 56 , 57 Lipophilic drugs will have a higher body distribution and lower plasma concentration, resulting in a longer half‐life and therapeutic duration; this includes fentanyl and most benzodiazepines and antipsychotics that are used in the ED setting. Conversely, the plasma concentration of hydrophilic drugs, including morphine, oxycodone, and hydromorphone, is higher and may lead to overmedication and toxicity. 58 Reduction of homeostatic capabilities and decline in functional reserves make geriatric patients more vulnerable to adverse drug effects, such as medication‐induced postural hypotension and an associated increased risk of falls. 59 The presence of other comorbidities and polypharmacy also make older adults more vulnerable to medication side effects. Due to these aging‐related changes in metabolism and distribution, one should consider the geriatric mantra of “start low and go slow” by selecting lower initial doses and slowly titrating up as needed.
4.2. Pharmacologic approach to pain in the older adult
Older adults may become altered or agitated in the setting of pain, regardless of whether the pain is associated with an acute illness. 14 , 41 Although opioids are associated with adverse drug effects when prescribed at standard doses in older adults and are considered “potentially inappropriate” in patients with history of falls or fractures, 60 under‐treatment of pain can adversely impact older adults’ quality of life 61 and precipitate agitation. Accordingly, if an agitated older ED patient has a painful condition, analgesics should be considered as a first step in pharmacologic management of agitation (Figure 1). Pharmacologic options for the treatment of pain in older ED patients include acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), topical adjuvant agents, ketamine, and opioids. The choice of agent will be influenced by pain severity, appropriateness of oral administration, and patient factors including allergies and renal and hepatic function (Table 1). Mild pain may be preferentially treated with acetaminophen, which can be used in doses of up to 3000 mg in a 24‐hour period. 62 Moderate pain can be treated orally with a combination of scheduled acetaminophen and short‐acting opioids such as hydromorphone and oxycodone at low doses. Severe pain should be treated parenterally with fast‐acting opioids such as fentanyl, hydromorphone, or morphine. 63 , 64 For the treatment of acute moderate to severe pain, we recommend low‐dose hydromorphone in combination with scheduled acetaminophen (Figure 1) guided by an observation‐based pain scale (Table 2). 64 Patient‐controlled analgesia should not be used for agitated patients or patients with dementia or delirium.
Risk of adverse drug effects should be considered when selecting an agent for pain management. NSAIDs may be useful in short courses under the close supervision of primary care physicians. However, given the risks of renal dysfunction and gastrointestinal bleeding associated with NSAIDS, acetaminophen is preferred as an oral non‐opioid agent. For patients who are at low risk for adverse drug effects from NSAIDs and likely to be discharged from the ED, recent evidence suggests that a single dose of ketorolac may be safe. 65 Although many opioids precipitate a release of histamine, this occurs more commonly with morphine and can result in decreased systemic vascular resistance and hypotension. 66 Additionally, morphine metabolites have neuro‐excitatory properties that can accumulate in the setting of renal dysfunction and cause depression of the central nervous system. 67 The risk of side effects from metabolites is particularly important for older patients receiving hospice or palliative care who rely on frequent and daily dosing of opioids. Because hydromorphone has inactive metabolites, it may be preferential in acute pain management. 68 , 69 Meperidine should not be administered to older adults, because it may precipitate or worsen delirium. 60 Due to variable metabolism and frequent drug–drug interactions, codeine and tramadol should also be avoided in older adults. 70 Opioids should be avoided in combination with benzodiazepines and gabapentinoids; when used in combination, these drugs have the potential to cause sedation and an increase in falls. 60 , 63
4.3. Pharmacologic approach to undifferentiated agitation in the older adult
Outside of patients with a primary psychiatric or painful condition, pharmacologic management for agitation should be limited to those demonstrating severe agitation and at risk to harm themselves or others, or to facilitate time‐sensitive diagnostic imaging, procedures, or treatment. 71 All currently available agents to treat agitation in older adults have notable side effects and questionable efficacy data supporting their use. In general, if pharmacologic intervention is necessary, oral therapies are preferred as they typically have fewer adverse effects and a longer therapeutic duration than intravenous or intramuscular administration. However, oral treatments have a slower onset of action and require patient cooperation. Given age‐related alterations in pharmacokinetics and metabolism and the risk of polypharmacy a lower dose should be used in older adults than typically used in younger adults (Table 1). 72 Most importantly, it is critical that emergency physicians allow adequate time for the drug to take effect. Although time of onset varies significantly by agent, average time of onset for most oral agents is at least 30 minutes, intramuscular agents at least 15 minutes, and intravenous agents 5 minutes. Droperidol and benzodiazepines are notable exceptions that have faster onset times (Table 1). 73 , 74 Failing to wait for therapeutic effect may lead to dose stacking or mixing of medications, which increases the risk of adverse drug effects in the older patient.
Research into the pharmacologic management of agitation in persons living with dementia has focused on outpatient or nursing home settings and is complicated by heterogeneity in subject population, agent and dose selection, duration of treatment, and outcomes measured. Studies on the pharmacologic management of delirium, on the other hand, have predominantly been performed in the inpatient or intensive care setting. In ED studies of the pharmacologic management of acute agitation, older adults are often excluded or under‐represented. 74 , 75 Accordingly, recommendations have been extrapolated from non‐ED based studies or prior expert consensus. ED‐based investigations evaluating the safety and efficacy of pharmacologic strategies for the management of severe agitation and aggression in older adults should be prioritized for future ED research. 76
4.3.1. Antipsychotics
First‐generation antipsychotics (haloperidol and droperidol) differ from second‐generation antipsychotics (clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, quetiapine, and aripiprazole) by their mechanism of action and side effects. First‐generation antipsychotics have greater activity at dopamine D2/D3 receptors that are highly expressed in the basal ganglia, whereas second‐generation antipsychotics have a relatively potent blockade of serotonin receptors and a lesser blockade of dopamine receptors. 77 , 78
Randomized clinical trials investigating the efficacy of first‐generation antipsychotics for the treatment of agitation have shown minimal improvement in behavioral scales. 79 Due to both low efficacy and a high risk of adverse effects, haloperidol is not recommended for routine use for agitation in dementia. 71 , 80 Use of droperidol drastically decreased following the issuance of a black box warning by the Food and Drug Administration. As a result, there is little research into the efficacy and side effects of droperidol in management of agitation in older adults and/or patients with dementia. 81 , 82 Due to dopamine receptor blockade, first‐generation antipsychotics have high rates of extrapyramidal side effects such as pseudoparkinsonism, akathisia, acute dystonia, and tardive dyskinesia 77 and should be avoided in patients with Parkinson's disease and Lewy body dementia (Table 1; Figure 1). Although adjunctive medications such as promethazine, benztropine, or diphenhydramine are sometimes prescribed to prevent extrapyramidal side effects, these medications should not be administered to older ED patients as they are at increased risk of adverse drug effects from the anticholinergic effects, including acute delirium. 60
In large‐scale outpatient studies of second‐generation antipsychotics in Alzheimer's disease, olanzapine and risperidone appear to be effective in managing anger, aggression, and paranoid ideas. However, adverse effects offset the therapeutic benefit in the outpatient setting. 83 , 84 Olanzapine is available in both intramuscular and oral routes that facilitates an easy transition from an intramuscular to oral agent. Quetiapine also demonstrates effectiveness on a global measure of behavioral and psychiatric symptoms in dementia in outpatient studies, but is associated with significantly higher rates of sedation. 83 , 84 Of the second‐generation antipsychotics, quetiapine has been shown to have the least extrapyramidal side effects and is therefore the preferred oral agent in patients with Parkinson's disease or Lewy body dementia. 85 , 86 , 87 Olanzapine, risperidone, and quetiapine also antagonize histamine receptors, which results in an increased risk of orthostatic hypotension, sedation, and falls in older adults; 88 , 89 the risk of orthostatic hypotension may be higher with quetiapine. 90
All antipsychotics carry a risk of QT prolongation, but this risk is greatest with first‐generation antipsychotic medications and droperidol specifically has a black box warning regarding QT prolongation and risk of torsades de pointes. 81 , 82 Caution should be taken in patients with channelopathies, congenital or baseline prolonged QT interval, and those who receive other QT‐prolonging medications. Anecdotally, some emergency physicians co‐administer intravenous magnesium sulfate when administering an antipsychotic to a patient at risk for torsades de pointes hoping to ameliorate this risk, although this is not evidence‐based. First‐ and second‐generation antipsychotics also carry a black box warning for an increased risk of mortality in elderly patients with dementia due to cardiac and infectious causes. 91 , 92 In hospitalized older adults, first‐ and second‐generation antipsychotics are associated with an increased risk of death or cardiopulmonary arrest. 93 Overall, the estimated number needed to harm for commonly administered antipsychotics ranges from 26–50, so these medications should only be used when clinically necessary. 94
4.3.2. Benzodiazepines
Benzodiazepines are first line for the treatment of patients with alcohol or benzodiazepine withdrawal or dependence (Figure 1). 45 Because benzodiazepines do not cause dopamine receptor blockade and associated extrapyramidal side effects, they may be preferable to antipsychotics in individuals with Parkinson's disease and Lewy body dementia who require parenteral treatment of severe agitation. Benzodiazepines may also be preferable to antipsychotics in patients who require sedation for emergent imaging or procedures, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or a lumbar puncture, because antipsychotics are less sedating and may require repeat administration and dose stacking to achieve the same level of sedation. If benzodiazepines are deemed the most appropriate therapy, short‐acting agents such as lorazepam and midazolam should be used instead of long‐acting agents such as diazepam. Otherwise, benzodiazepines should be avoided whenever possible due to their propensity to cause prolonged sedation, respiratory depression, delirium, and falls. 60 , 95
4.3.3. Ketamine and combination agents
Ketamine is being used increasingly in the ED for acute pain and management of excited delirium syndrome among younger patients but there is minimal research evaluating its efficacy and adverse drug effects in older adults. Studies of ketamine at sub‐dissociative doses for pain have demonstrated a high rate of side effects in older adults including unreality and agitation. 96 , 97 Therefore, we do not currently recommend ketamine for the management of agitation in older adults. Although administering combinations of agents (eg, a “B52” combination of benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, and anticholinergics) is a common practice when treating severe agitation in younger patients, these combinations should be avoided in the geriatric population due to an increased risk of adverse drug effects. 60 , 98 Intramuscular olanzapine and intravenous benzodiazepines should not be administered within 2 hours of each other due to potential risks of hypotension and cardiopulmonary depression. 88 , 99
5. PREVENTION
Many of the non‐pharmacologic strategies previously discussed can be helpful in preventing agitation and delirium in older adults. This includes encouraging a family member or caregiver to remain at beside of a person living with dementia for reassurance and re‐orientation, pain management, and providing diversional activities, vision and hearing aids, hydration and nutrition. 100 Additional components of non‐pharmacologic delirium prevention programs that can be integrated into ED care include sleep enhancement, avoiding tethers such as Foley catheters, and avoiding delirium‐precipitating medications. 100 With respect to sleep hygiene, whenever feasible at‐risk patients should not be placed in the hallways overnight. For patients in ED observation units, nighttime disruptions can be minimized by limiting nighttime vital signs, phlebotomy, and medication administration. Emergency physicians should avoid administering medications known to precipitate delirium in at‐risk patients including benzodiazepines, other sedative‐hypnotics, and medications with strong anticholinergics effects, such as first‐generation antihistamines and muscle relaxants. 60 The American Geriatrics Society Updated Beers Criteria has a comprehensive list of medications that may be inappropriate in older adults including those that precipitate delirium. 60 There are no medications that have been consistently shown to prevent delirium. 100 Because prolonged ED length of stay may be associated with an increase in incident delirium in hospitalized patients, emergency physicians should minimize ED length of stay and boarding for those patients at greatest risk of developing delirium, including persons living with dementia. 101
6. CONCLUSION
Over the next several decades, emergency physicians will care for increasing numbers of agitated older adults due to population growth among individuals over the age of 65 and those living with dementia. Agitation and aggression may due to hyperactive delirium, dementia, psychiatric disorders, or intoxication due to alcohol or other substances. It is critical that the physician obtain information about a patient's pre‐existing psychiatric conditions, baseline cognitive status, and the acuity of any change in cognition or behavior to identify the underlying etiology. Agitation, aggression, and aberrant motor activity are common in persons living with dementia and may be how a person living with dementia communicates pain, unmet physical needs, or boredom. Non‐pharmacologic approaches to manage mild or moderate agitation in persons living with dementia include diversional activities and sensory stimulation which can be easily implemented in the ED setting. New‐onset psychotic symptoms in the absence of dementia should raise concern for acute delirium, and treatment should focus on identifying and managing the precipitating causes. If an agitated older ED patient has a painful condition, analgesics should be considered as a first step in the pharmacologic management of agitation. Outside of patients with primary psychiatric or painful conditions, pharmacologic management for agitation should be limited to those demonstrating severe agitation and at risk of harming themselves or others, or to facilitate time‐sensitive diagnostic imaging, procedures, or treatment. Low doses of second‐generation antipsychotics are preferred for the treatment of agitation in patients who do not have Parkinson's disease or Lewy body dementia. Slow titrations of medications should be employed to avoid dose stacking, drug accumulation, and side effects. Even with appropriate dosing and titration, many medications used to treat agitation carry significant risks and are associated with an increased risk of death in hospitalized older adults. ED‐based investigations evaluating the safety and efficacy of non‐pharmacologic and pharmacologic strategies for the management of agitation and aggression in older ED patients should be prioritized for future research.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Kennedy M, Koehl J, Shenvi CL, et al. The agitated older adult in the emergency department: a narrative review of common causes and management strategies. JACEP Open. 2020;1:812–823. 10.1002/emp2.12110
“The Agitated and Combative Older Patient in the Emergency Department: Management Strategies and Potential Pitfalls,” presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine, May 17, 2018, in Indianapolis, Indiana by Alexander Lo, MD, PhD, Maura Kennedy, MD, MPH, and Michael LaMantia, MD, MPH.
Funding and support: ByJACEP Open policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist.
Supervising Editor: Catherine A. Marco, MD.
REFERENCES
- 1. Mather M, Jacobsen LA, Pollard KM. Aging in the United States. Popul. Bull. 2015:70(2):1‐23. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Aftab A, Shah AA. Behavioral emergencies special considerations in the geriatric psychiatric patient. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2017;40(3):449‐462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Backhouse T, Camino J, Mioshi E. What do we know about behavioral crises in dementia? A systematic review. J Alzheimer's Dis. 2018;62(1):99‐113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Radue R, Walaszek A, Asthana S. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;167:437‐454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hebert LE, Weuve J, Scherr PA, Evans DA. Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010–2050) estimated using the 2010 census. Neurology. 2013;80(19):1778‐1783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. LaMantia MA, Stump TE, Messina FC, Miller DK, Callahan CM. Emergency department use among older adults with dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2016;30(1):35‐40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Piechniczek‐Buczek J. Psychiatric emergencies in the elderly population. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2006;24(2):467‐490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Cohen C, Zhao J, Cohen CI, Meesters PD, Zhao J. New perspectives on schizophrenia in later life: implications for treatment, policy, and research. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2:340‐350. www.thelancet.com/psychiatry. Accessed April 25, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Choi NG, Marti CNN, DiNitto DM, Choi BY. Alcohol use as risk factors for older adults’ emergency department visits: a latent class analysis. West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(7):1146‐1158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Seim L, Vijapura P, Pagali S, Burton MC. Common substance use disorders in older adults. Hosp Pract. 2020;16(7):1‐8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Wolf MU, Goldberg Y, Freedman M. Aggression and agitation in dementia. Contin (MINNEAP MINN). 2018;24(3):783‐803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kolanowski A, Boltz M, Galik E, et al. Determinants of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: a scoping review of the evidence HHS Public Access. Nurs Outlook. 2017;65(5):515‐529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Maust DT, Kales HC, McCammon RJ, Blow FC, Leggett A, Langa KM. Distress associated with dementia‐related psychosis and agitation in relation to healthcare utilization and costs HHS public access. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;25(10):1074‐1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Inouye SK, Westendorp RGJ, Saczynski JS. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014;383(9920):911‐922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bessey LJ, Radue RM, Chapman EN, Boyle LL, Shah MN. Behavioral health needs of older adults in the emergency department. Clin Geriatr Med. 2018;34(3):469‐489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Weitzel T, Robinson S, Barnes MR, et al. The special needs of the hospitalized patient with dementia. Medsurg Nurs. 2011;20(1):13‐18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Barron EA, Holmes J. Delirium within the emergency care setting, occurrence and detection: a systematic review. Emerg Med J. 2013;30(4):263‐268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Han JH, Wilson A, Ely EW. Delirium in the older emergency department patient: a quiet epidemic. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2010;28(3):611‐631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Han JH, Vasilevskis EE, Chandrasekhar R, et al. Delirium in the Emergency Department and Its Extension into Hospitalization (DELINEATE) Study: effect on 6‐month Function and Cognition. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65(6):1333‐1338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Han JH, Shintani A, Eden S, et al. Delirium in the emergency department: an independent predictor of death within 6 months. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56(3):244‐252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kennedy M, Enander RA, Tadiri SP, Wolfe RE, Shapiro NI, Marcantonio ER. Delirium risk prediction, healthcare use and mortality of elderly adults in the emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(3):462‐469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM‐5. 5th ed Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Inouye SK, Van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method: a new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113(12):941‐948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Han JH, Wilson A, Vasilevskis EE, et al. Diagnosing delirium in older emergency department patients: validity and reliability of the delirium triage screen and the brief confusion assessment method. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;62(5):457‐465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. O'Sullivan D, Brady N, Manning E, et al. Validation of the 6‐Item Cognitive Impairment Test and the 4AT test for combined delirium and dementia screening in older emergency department attendees. Age Ageing. 2018;47(1):61‐68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Fick DM, Inouye SK, Guess J, et al. Preliminary development of an ultrabrief two‐item bedside test for delirium. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(10):645‐650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Suffoletto B, Miller T, Frisch A, Callaway C. Emergency physician recognition of delirium. Postgrad Med J. 2013;89(1057):621‐625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hustey FM, Meldon SW. The prevalence and documentation of impaired mental status in elderly emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39(3):248‐253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Fong TG, Davis D, Growdon ME, Albuquerque A, Inouye SK. The interface between delirium and dementia in elderly adults. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(8):823‐832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Han JH, Zimmerman EE, Cutler N, et al. Delirium in older emergency department patients: recognition, risk factors, and psychomotor subtypes. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(3):193‐200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Khouzam HR, Battista MA, Emes R, Ahles S. Psychoses in late life: evaluation and management of disorders seen in primary care. Geriatrics. 2005;60(3):26‐33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Thakur ME, Blazer DG, Steffens DC, eds. Clinical Manual of Geriatric Psychiatry. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Lenze EJ, Wetherell JL. A Lifespan view of anxiety disorders. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011;13(4):381‐399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Hedegaard H, Curtin SC, Warner M. Increase in suicide mortality in the United States, 1999–2018. NCHS Data Brief, no 362. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Warden V, Hurley AC, Volicer L. Development and psychometric evaluation of the pain assessment in advanced dementia (PAINAD) scale. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003;4(1):9‐15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Ricker JR, Mulligan M. Activity kits as a first line intervention to care for individuals with dementia. Geriatr Nurs (Minneap). 2017;38(6):604‐605. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Sanon M, Baumlin KM, Kaplan SS, Grudzen CR. Care and respect for elders in emergencies program: a preliminary report of a volunteer approach to enhance care in the emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(2):365‐370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. McCabe D. Therapeutic Activity Kits. Try this: best practices in nursing care to older adults with dementia. 2019; (4). Hartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, New York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing. https://consultgeri.org/try-this/dementia/issue-d4.pdf
- 39. Gower LEJ, Gatewood MO'Keefe, Kang CS. Emergency department management of delirium in the elderly. West J Emerg Med. 2012;13(2):194‐201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Shenvi C, Kennedy M, Austin CA, Wilson MP, Gerardi M, Schneider S. Managing delirium and agitation in the older emergency department patient: the ADEPT tool. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;75(2):136‐145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Husebo BS, Ballard C, Aarsland D. Pain treatment of agitation in patients with dementia: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011;26(10):1012‐1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Neufeld KJ, Yue J, Robinson TN, Inouye SK, Needham DM. Antipsychotic medication for prevention and treatment of delirium in hospitalized adults: a systematic review and meta‐analysis . J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(4):705‐714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Burry L, Mehta S, Perreault MM, et al. Antipsychotics for treatment of delirium in hospitalised non‐ICU patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018(6):CD005594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Shenvi C, Kennedy M, Wilson MP, Austin CA., Gerardi M, Schneider S. The ADEPTool. June 18, 2018. https://www.acep.org/adept. Accessed March 12, 2020.
- 45. Wilson MP, Pepper D, Currier GW, Holloman GH, Feifel D. Best Practices in Evaluation and Treatment of Agitation . The psychopharmacology of agitation: consensus statement of the American association for emergency psychiatry project BETA psychopharmacology workgroup. West J Emerg Med. 2012;13(1):26‐34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Zeller SL, Citrome L, Wilson MP. Managing agitation associated with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in the emergency setting. West J Emerg Med. 2016;17(2):165‐172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Krause M, Huhn M, Schneider‐Thoma J, Rothe P, Smith RC, Leucht S. Antipsychotic drugs for elderly patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018;28:1360‐1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Colijn MA, Nitta BH, Grossberg GT. Psychosis in later life: a review and update. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2015;23(5):354‐367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Ramos K, Stanley MA. Anxiety disorders in late life. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2018;41(1):55‐64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Pary R, Sarai SK, Sumner R, Lippmann S. Anxiety in geriatrics. Postgrad Med. 2019;131(5):330‐332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Markota M, Rummans TA, Bostwick JM, Lapid MI. Benzodiazepine use in older adults: dangers, management, and alternative therapies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(11):1632‐1639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Davies DF, Shock NW. Age changes in glomerular filtration rate, effective renal plasma flow, and tubular excretory capacity in adult males. J Clin Invest. 1950;29(5):496‐507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Tracy RE, Parra D, Eisaguirre W, Torres Balanza RA. The action of aging upon coronary intima and renal microvasculature in USA and Andes populations. Mech Ageing Dev. 2002;123(4):327‐339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Anantharaju A, Feller A, Chedid A. Aging liver: a review. Gerontology. 2002;48(6):343‐353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. McLachlan M. The ageing kidney. Lancet. 1978;15(2):143‐145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Dunnill MS, Halley W. Some observations on the quantitative anatomy of the kidney. J Pathol. 1973;110(2):113‐121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Fülöp T, Wórum I, Csongor J, Fóris G, Leövey A. Body composition in elderly people: I. Determination of body composition by multiisotope method and the elimination kinetics of these isotopes in healthy elderly subjects. Gerontology. 1985;31(1):6‐14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Mulsant BH. Challenges of the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with dementia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;22(4):317‐320. 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Turnheim K. Drug dosage in the elderly. Is it rational? Drugs Aging. 1998;13(5):357‐379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Fick DM, Semla TP, Steinman M, et al. American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(4):674‐694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Cavalieri TA. Managing pain in geriatric patients. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007;107(suppl_4):ES10‐ES16.17986672 [Google Scholar]
- 62. Acetaminophen . In: In Depth Answers [safari]. Greenwood Village, CO: Truven Health Analytics. Available from: http://www.mircomedex.com. Accessed February 25, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 63. Cavalieri T. Pain management in the elderly. J Am Osteopat Assoc. 2002;102(9):481‐485. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. de Vries M, Gravel J, Horn D, McLeod S, Varner C. Comparative efficacy of opioids for older adults presenting to the emergency department with acute pain. Can Fam Physician. 2019;27(4):327‐335. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Anderson GL, Mattson AE, Brown CS, Cabrera D, Mara KC, Bellolio MF. Safety of parenteral ketorolac use for analgesia in geriatric emergency department patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;S0735‐6757(19)30386‐9. 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Baldo BA, Pham NH. Histamine‐releasing and allergenic properties of opioid analgesic drugs: resolving the two. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40(2):216‐235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. De Gregori S, De Gregori M, Ranzani GN, Allegri M, Minella C, Regazzi M. Morphine metabolism, transport and brain disposition. Metab Brain Dis. 2012;27(1):1‐5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Lussier D, Richarz U, Finco G. Use of hydromorphone, with particular reference to the OROS® formulation, in the elderly. Drugs and Aging. 2010;27(4):327‐335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Lexi‐Drugs. https://www.wolterskluwercdi.com/lexicomp-online/. Accessed February 18, 2020.
- 70. McLachlan AJ, Bath S, Naganathan V, et al. Clinical pharmacology of analgesic medicines in older people: Impact of frailty and cognitive impairment. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;71(3):351‐364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Reus VI, Fochtmann LJ, Eyler AE, et al. The American psychiatric association practice guideline on the use of antipsychotics to treat agitation or psychosis in patients with dementia. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173(5):543‐546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Rayner A V., O'Brien JG, Shoenbachler B. Behavior disorders of dementia: recognition and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2006;73(4):647‐652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Zun LS. Evidence‐based review of pharmacotherapy for acute agitation. Part 1: Onset of efficacy. J Emerg Med. 2018;54(3):364‐374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Klein LR, Driver BE, Miner JR, et al. Intramuscular midazolam, olanzapine, ziprasidone, or haloperidol for treating acute agitation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;72(4):374‐385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Zeller SL, Rhoades RW. Systematic reviews of assessment measures and pharmacologic treatments for agitation. Clin Ther. 2010;32:403‐425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Shenvi C, Wilson MP, Aldai A, Pepper D, Gerardi M. A research agenda for the assessment and management of acute behavioral changes in elderly emergency department patients. West J Emerg Med. 2019;20(2):393‐402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Meltzer HY. Clinical studies on the mechanism of action of clozapine: the dopamine‐serotonin hypothesis of schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989;99(suppl):S18‐S27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Kuroki T, Nagao N, Nakahara T. Neuropharmacology of second‐generation antipsychotic drugs: a validity of the serotonin‐dopamine hypothesis. Prog Brain Res. 2008;172:199‐212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Sink KM, Holden KF, Yaffe K. Pharmacological treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia: a review of the evidence. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;293(5):596‐608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Lonergan E, Luxenberg J, Colford J. Haloperidol for agitation in dementia. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2002;(2):CD002852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Chase PB, Biros MH. A retrospective review of the use and safety of droperidol in a large, high‐risk, inner‐city emergency department patient population. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9(12):1402‐1410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Horowitz BZ, Bizovi K, Moreno R. Droperidol‐behind the black box warning. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9(6):615‐618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Schneider LS, Tariot PN, Dagerman KS, et al. Effectiveness of atypical antipsychotic drugs in patients with Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(15):1525‐1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Sultzer DL, Davis SM, Tariot PN, et al. Clinical symptom responses to atypical antipsychotic medications in Alzheimer's disease: Phase 1 outcomes from the CATIE‐AD effectiveness trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(7):844‐854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Gareri P, Segura‐García C, Manfredi VGL, et al. Use of atypical antipsychotics in the elderly: a clinical review. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:1363‐1373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Hershey LA, Coleman‐Jackson R. Pharmacological management of dementia with lewy bodies. Drugs Aging. 2019;36(4):309‐319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Cummings J, Ritter A, Rothenberg K. Advances in Management of neuropsychiatric syndromes in neurodegenerative diseases. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21(8):79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Marder SR, Sorsaburu S, Dunayevich E, et al. Case reports of postmarketing adverse event experiences with olanzapine intramuscular treatment in patients with agitation. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71(4):433‐441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Wilson MP, Nordstrom K, Hopper A, Porter A, Castillo EM, Vilke GM. Risperidone in the emergency setting is associated with more hypotension in elderly patients. J Emerg Med. 2017;53(5):735‐739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Currier GW, Trenton AJ, Walsh PG, Van Wijngaarden E. A pilot, open‐label safety study of quetiapine for treatment of moderate psychotic agitation in the emergency setting. J Psychiatr Pract. 2006;12(4):223‐228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Leucht S, Cipriani A, Spineli L, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis. Lancet. 2013;382(9896):951‐962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Knol W, Van Marum RJ, Jansen PAF, Souverein PC, Schobben AFAM, Egberts ACG. Antipsychotic drug use and risk of pneumonia in elderly people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(4):661‐666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Basciotta M, Zhou W, Ngo L, Donnino M, Marcantonio ER, Herzig SJ. Antipsychotics and the risk of mortality or cardiopulmonary arrest in hospitalized adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;68(3):544‐550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Maust DT, Kim HM, Seyfried LS, et al. Antipsychotics, other psychotropics, and the risk of death in patients with dementia: number needed to harm. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(5):438‐445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Lonergan E, Luxenberg J, Sastre AA. Benzodiazepines for delirium. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(4):CD006379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Motov AS. Sub‐dissociative dose ketamine administration for managing pain in the emergency department. World J Emerg Med. 2018;9(4):249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Motov S, Mann S, Drapkin J, et al. Intravenous subdissociative‐dose ketamine versus morphine for acute geriatric pain in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(2):220‐227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Agostini JV, Leo‐Summers LS, Inouye SK. Cognitive and other adverse effects of diphenhydramine use in hospitalized older patients. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(17):2091‐2097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Zacher JL, Roche‐Desilets J. Hypotension secondary to the combination of intramuscular olanzapine and intramuscular lorazepam. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66(12):1614‐1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Siddiqi N, Harrison JK, Clegg A, et al. Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non‐ICU patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;3:CD005563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Bo M, Bonetto M, Bottignole G, et al. Length of stay in the emergency department and occurrence of delirium in older medical patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(5):1114‐1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Zun LS. Evidence‐based review of pharmacotherapy for acute agitation. Part 2: Safety. J Emerg Med. 2018;54(4):522‐532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Martel ML, Klein LR, Rivard RL, Cole JB. A large retrospective cohort of patients receiving intravenous olanzapine in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23:29‐35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Meyer‐Massetti C, Cheng CM, Sharpe BA, Meier CR, Guglielmo BJ. The FDA extended warning for intravenous haloperidol and torsades de pointes: how should institutions respond? J Hosp Med. 2010;5(4):E8‐E16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
