Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 6;66(5):427–433. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2020-059

Table 7. Success rates of Second-oocyte collection by cutting the position at the First-oocyte collection.

Cutting position No. of oviducts No. (%) * of oviducts contained COCs No. (average) ** of normal oocytes collected ***
Control 12 12 (100) a 199 (16.6) a
Front 17 13 (76.5) a 230 (13.5) a
Middle 13 4 (30.8) b 66 (5.1) b
Rear 40 10 (25.0) b 190 (4.8) b

COCs: Cumulus oocytes complexes. Total 41 mice were used in this experiment. For some mice, the ampulla was cut at different positions in the same individual.* Different letters indicate significant differences by Pearson’s Chi-square test (P < 0.01). ** Different letters indicate significant differences by t-test (P < 0.01). *** Number of oocytes collected per an oviduct.