Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 14;2020:8870270. doi: 10.1155/2020/8870270

Table 2.

Differences in the perception of attractiveness of anterior crowding and spacing with and without upper lips position and according to demographic characteristics and groups.

Case Demographics Groups
Gender Age History of orthodontic treatment
Mild crowding
 Without lips 0.480 0.493 0.961 0.002
 With lips 0.195 0.371 0.231 0.002

Moderate crowding
 Without lips 0.037 0.102 0.152 0.796
 With lips 0.708 0.897 0.232 0.015

Severe crowding
 Without lips 0.485 0.316 0.940 0.070
 With lips 0.753 0.612 0.657 0.001

Mild spacing
 Without lips 0.211 0.045 0.817 0.583
 With lips 0.611 0.323 0.048 0.009

Moderate spacing
 Without lips 0.428 0.059 0.635 0.069
 With lips 0.490 0.164 0.962 0.006

Severe spacing
 Without lips 0.865 0.091 0.798 0.004
 With lips 0.205 0.154 0.437 0.616