Table 2.
Differences in the perception of attractiveness of anterior crowding and spacing with and without upper lips position and according to demographic characteristics and groups.
| Case | Demographics | Groups | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Age | History of orthodontic treatment | ||
| Mild crowding | ||||
| Without lips | 0.480 | 0.493 | 0.961 | 0.002 |
| With lips | 0.195 | 0.371 | 0.231 | 0.002 |
|
| ||||
| Moderate crowding | ||||
| Without lips | 0.037 | 0.102 | 0.152 | 0.796 |
| With lips | 0.708 | 0.897 | 0.232 | 0.015 |
|
| ||||
| Severe crowding | ||||
| Without lips | 0.485 | 0.316 | 0.940 | 0.070 |
| With lips | 0.753 | 0.612 | 0.657 | 0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Mild spacing | ||||
| Without lips | 0.211 | 0.045 | 0.817 | 0.583 |
| With lips | 0.611 | 0.323 | 0.048 | 0.009 |
|
| ||||
| Moderate spacing | ||||
| Without lips | 0.428 | 0.059 | 0.635 | 0.069 |
| With lips | 0.490 | 0.164 | 0.962 | 0.006 |
|
| ||||
| Severe spacing | ||||
| Without lips | 0.865 | 0.091 | 0.798 | 0.004 |
| With lips | 0.205 | 0.154 | 0.437 | 0.616 |