Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 28;10:18427. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75364-3

Table 3.

Evaluation of the dominant-negative potential of somatic TP53 mutations using a yeast-based assay.

ID Protein variant % Net activity (P21, 30 °C) Classification
15 patients with Mut/noDel
MS0273 p.Arg175His 61 D
CA0082 p.Arg213Leu > 100 r
CF0003 p.Pro278Arg 73 D
GM0252 p.Ile195Thr > 100 r
MG0248 p.Arg282Trp > 100 r
DD0478 p.Pro191del > 100 r
GC0448 p.Arg248Trp 39 D
PA0254 p.Ala161Thr > 100 r
AR0222 p.His193Arg 59 D
CG0620 p.Arg209fs > 100 r
AA0396 p.Val157Asp 61 D
CR0115 p.Phe113Ser > 100 r
AG0464 p.Val173Met 40 D
SG0168 p.Ala88fs > 100 r
DA0455 p.Arg273His 32 D

Results are shown as percentage of the activity of the co-expression of wild-type (WT) and mutant P53 proteins with respect to the expression of the single WT P53 set as 100%. P53 proteins (WT and mutant) were co-expressed in yLFM-P21-5′ reporter strain and grown at 30 °C. Mutant P53s are classified as dominant (D) or recessive (r), when the net activity is below or above 100%, respectively.