Table 4. The significant p-values and direction of effects for post-hoc comparisons.

Comparison	Significant p values	Direction of effect
Main effects
Condition	< 0.001	T > W a
	< 0.001	D > W a
Hemisphere     Region	0.008	Left > Right a
	< 0.001	MIFG > IPL a
	< 0.001	MSTG > IPL a
Group differences
Watch, Right MSTG	0.018	TD > ASD a
Watch, Right IPL	0.011	ASD > TD a
Do, Left MSTG	< 0.001	TD > ASD a
Do, Left IPL	0.005	ASD > TD a
Do, Right MIFG	0.007	TD > ASD a
Do, Right MSTG	0.023	TD > ASD a
Do, Right IPL	< 0.001	ASD > TD a
Together, Left MSTG	< 0.001	TD > ASD a
Together, Left IPL	< 0.001	ASD > TD a
Together, Right MIFG	< 0.001	TD > ASD a
Together, Right IPL	< 0.001	ASD > TD a
Conditional differences
TD, Left MIFG	< 0.001	D > W a
	< 0.001	T > W a
TD, Left MSTG	< 0.001	D> W a
	< 0.001	T > W a
TD, Left IPL     TD, Right MIFG	0.035	T > W b
	< 0.001	T > W a
	< 0.001	D> W a
	0.006	T > D b
ASD, Left MIFG	< 0.001	D> W a
	< 0.001	T > W a
	0.044	T >D b
ASD, Left IPL	< 0.001	D> W a
	< 0.001	T > W a
ASD, Right MIFG	0.040	D > W b
ASD, Right MSTG	0.009	T > W a
	0.025	T > D b
ASD, Right IPL	0.003	T > W a
Hemispheric differences
TD, Do, MSTG	0.001	L > R a
ASD, Do, MIFG	0.003	L > R a
ASD, Together, MIFG	< 0.001	L > R a
ASD, Together, MSTG	0.003	R > L a

^a indicates p-value < 0.05 and the effect survived FDR correction while

^b indicates p-value < 0.05 but the effect did not survive FDR corrections.