Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 29;17(10):e1003370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003370

Table 2. Summary information providing an overview of the data included in the data analysis using the DHS data and published literature included in the meta-analysis.

DHS Analysis Data Meta-Analysis Data
N studies 57 43
Year data collection (range) Nov 2006–Dec 2018 Apr 2006–May 2019
Continental region, N (n unique countries)a
African 57 (23) 17 (7)
Americas 0 8 (4)
Asia 0 15 (7)
Pacific and Middle East 0 3 (2)
All age surveys versus children only, % (n/N studies) 10.5% (6/57) 97.7% (42/43)
Median age surveyed (min–max) 2 (2–7) 22 (0.5–100)a
Sex, % male (cluster range) 50.5 (47.0–52.3) 54.0 (31.9–100)b
N individuals sampled (n malaria positive) 420,659 (59,050) 132,590 (11,349)
Median age of malaria positive (min–max) 3 (2–5) 22 (0.5–90)a
% Male malaria positive (cluster range) 50.9 (46.0–53.2) 47.0 (37.8–56.2)b
Number of individuals per model type (n malaria positive)
RACD versus community 72,498 (24,836) 5,661 (288)
RACD versus neighbours 0 23,497 (564)
MSAT 177,243 (50,590) 40,851 (6,238)
MTAT 208,140 (59,050) 62,581 (4,259)

a22 records did not report age in a relevant format.

b10 records did not report gender in a relevant format to extract.

Abbreviations: DHS, demographic health survey; MSAT, Mass Screen and Treat; MTAT, Mass Test and Treat; RACD, Reactive Case Detection