Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 29;15(10):e0240429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240429

Table 8. Inversion detection task.

We evaluated three methods (PCA with clustering, PC-SNP association testing, and Cluster-SNP association testing) on the inversion detection task (is an inversion present?) using our three benchmark test cases (negative, positive from a single population, and positive from multiple populations). For each chromosome arm used, we indicated known inversions and whether the inversion was detected by a given method. The D. melanogaster 3R chromosome arm has three mutually-exclusive inversions, which we list separately.

Test Case Chrom. Inversion Clusters PC-SNP Cluster-SNP
Negative D. mel. 3L None 1 No No
Negative 34 An gam. and col. 3L None 4 No No
Negative 150 An gam. and col. 3L None 2 No No
Single D. mel. 2L In(2L)t 3 Yes (PC 1) Yes
Single D. mel. 2R In(2R)NS 3 Yes (PC 1) Yes
Single D. mel. 3R In(3R)Mo 3 Yes (PC 1)* Yes*
Single In(3R)p 3 Yes (PC 1)* Yes*
Single In(3R)K 3 Yes (PC 1)* Yes*
Multiple 150 An. gam. and col. 2L 2La 3 Yes (PC 2) No
Multiple 81 An. gam. 2L 2La 2 Yes (PC 1) Yes
Multiple 34 An. gam. and col. 2L 2La 4 Yes (PC 1) Yes

We compared inversions detected by the three methods to the known inversion karyotypes for these data sets taken from the original papers describing the data [17, 3739]. If an inversion was present with no population structure, three clusters corresponding to three possible genotypes (which may not all be present) would be expected.

*Multiple, mutually-exclusive inversions were detected as a single inversion by our methods.