Table 3. Summary statistics of respondents reporting and not reporting anthrax outbreaks in animals according to interface type and site.
| Category | % Reporting anthrax | % Not reporting anthrax | *OR | 95% CI | Yates Corrected X2 | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interface | 59.3 | 40.7 | - | - | - | - | |
| Non-interface | 83.6 | 16.4 | 3.5 | 2.1–5.8 | 23.2 | 0.0000 | |
| Site | |||||||
| Interface | Malipati | 26.5 | 73.5 | - | - | - | - |
| Hwange | 61.5 | 38.5 | 4.4 | 2.1–9.7 | 13.5 | 0.0002 | |
| Ngamo | 70.4 | 29.6 | 6.6 | 3.0–14.6 | 21.6 | 0.0000 | |
| Chizvirizvi | 88.5 | 11.5 | 21.3 | 7.8–58.3 | 43.0 | 0.0000 | |
| Non-interface | Chomupani | 20.0 | 80.0 | - | - | - | - |
| Tsholotsho South | 82.6 | 17.4 | 19.0 | 5.0–72.2 | 21.0 | 0.0000 | |
| Magunje | 100.0 | 0.0 | - | - | 70.4 | 0.0000 |
*A site with the lowest percentage value was taken as the reference for calculating the odds ratio (OR) and similarly the interface type with the lower percentage value was taken as the reference for calculating OR.