Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 19;14(10):e0008800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008800

Table 4. Summary of respondents’ knowledge and practices on prevention and management of anthrax in livetsock according to interface and non-interface areas.

Variable Responses Interface (n = 226) Non-interface (n = 146) Overall (n = 372)
No. % (95% CI) No % (95% CI) No % (95% CI)
Can 00a0confidently recognize signs of anthrax in animals Yes 62 27.4a (21.8–33.8) 48 32.9a (25.5–41.2) 110 29.6 (25.0–34.5)
Aware of human anthrax cases in general Yes 24 10.6a (7.1–15.6) 98 67.1b (58.8–74.5) 122 32.8 (28.1–37.9)
Aware of human anthrax cutaneous cases Yes 22 9.7a (6.3–14.6) 98 67.1b (58.8–74.5) 120 32.3 (27.6–37.3)
Aware of human anthrax enteric cases Yes 2 0.9 (0.2–3.5) 0 0.0 (0.1–3.2) 2 0.5 (0.1–2.1)
Diagnosis confirmed in animals Yes 80 35.4a (29.3–42.1) 94 64.4b (56.0–72.0) 174 46.8 (41.6–52.0)
Disease detected in animals as trace-back from human cases Yes 13 5.8a (3.2–9.9) 26 17.8b (12.2–25.2) 29 7.8 (5.4–11.1)
Carcass disposed by burning / burying Yes 96 42.5a (36.0–49.2) 56 38.4a (30.5–46.8) 152 40.9 (35.9, 46.1)
Carcass salvaged for human consumption Yes 40 17.7a (13.1–23.4) 26 17.8a (12.2–25.2) 66 17.7 (14.1, 22.1)
Carcass left to dissipate into the environment Yes 62 27.4a (21.8–33.8) 12 8.2b (4.5–14.2) 74 20.0 (16.0, 24.4)
Uncertain how carcasses were disposed off Yes 28 12.4a (8.5–17.6) 30 20.6a (14.5–28.2) 58 15.6 (12.1–19.8)
Routine/regular vaccination of animals Yes 182 80.5a (74.6–85.4) 62 42.5b (34.4–50.9) 244 65.6 (60.5–70.4)
Vaccination in face of outbreaks only Yes 92 40.7a (34.3–47.4) 88 60.3b (51.8–68.2) 180 48.4 (43.2–53.6)
Will not report to veterinary authorities when anthrax suspected Yes 40 17.7a (13.1–23.4) 22 15.1a (9.9–22.2) 62 16.7 (13.1, 20.9)

Values with similar superscripts in the same rows are not significantly different (p>0.5).