Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 11;29(11):1569–1579. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01471-1

Table 2.

The distribution of sex, gestational age, cerebral palsy (CP) type, gross motor function and associated impairments of the total population group of children with CP, of the responders, and of the study participants

Population Responders Screening participants
n = 264 n = 232 n = 213
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Sex
Male 141 (53) 126 (54) 115 (54)
Female 123 (47) 106 (46) 98 (46)
Gestational age
Week 23–27 26 (10) 21 (9) 20 (10)
Week 28–31 30 (11) 23 (10)a 22 (10)
Week 32–36 45 (17) 40 (17) 37 (17)
Week 37–42 163 (62) 148 (64) 134 (63)
CP type
Unilateral spastic CP 103 (39) 89 (38) 89 (42)
Bilateral spastic CP 98 (37) 83 (36) 76 (36)
Dyskinetic CP 45 (17) 44 (19)b 32 (15)
Ataxic CP 18 (7) 16 (7) 16 (7)
GMFCS
I 127 (48) 110 (48) 110 (52)
II 40 (15) 33 (14) 33 (15)
III 20 (8) 19 (8) 19 (9)
IV 35 (13) 31 (13) 30 (14)
V 42 (16) 39 (17) 21 (10)
Visual impairment (VI)
No VI 213 (81) 189 (82) 183 (86)
VI not severe 18 (7) 15 (6) 15 (7)
Severe VI 33 (12) 28 (12) 15 (7)
Hearing impairment
No 243 (92) 214 (92) 198 (93)
Sensorineural 21 (8) 18 (8) 15 (7)
Intellectual level
Normal 98 (37) 90 (39) 90 (42)
Borderline 26 (10) 19 (8)c 19 (9)
Mild ID 57 (22) 47 (20) 47 (22)
Moderate ID 19 (7) 19 (8) 19 (9)
Severe ID 32 (12) 29 (13) 26 (12)
Profound ID 32 (12) 28 (12) 12 (6)
Epilepsy
No 137 (52) 118 (51) 117 (55)
Previous 18 (7) 15 (6) 15 (7)
Active 109 (41) 99 (43) 81 (38)
Viking Speech Scale (VSS)
I 122 (46) 104 (45) 104 (49)
II 58 (22) 51 (22) 51 (24)
III 17 (7) 17 (7) 17 (8)
IV 67 (25) 60 (26) 41 (19)
ASD diagnoses 47 (18) 42 (18) 42 (20)
ADHD diagnoses 55 (21) 49 (21) 49 (23)
Both ASD and ADHD diagnoses 18 (7) 18 (8) 18 (8)
No diagnosed-associated impairment 65 (25) 57 (25) 57 (27)

The three subgroups with significant differences between responders and non-responders are marked. (GMFCS Gross Motor Function Classification System; ID Intellectual Disability; ASD Autism Spectrum Disorder; ADHD Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder)

aSignificantly higher proportion in the non-responder group of 32 children (p = 0.046)

bSignificantly lower proportion in the non-responder group of 32 children (p = 0.025)

cSignificantly higher proportion in the non-responder group of 32 children (p = 0.015)