Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 16;11:566596. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.566596

TABLE 2.

Microbial cell load (log cfu/g) of Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 20016, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis DSM 10140, and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum c16 and c19 immobilized for 15, 20, 25, and 30 min on apple pieces and stored at 4°C for 12 days.

Microorganisms Days Log cfu/g
15 20 25 30
L. reuteri DSM 20016 0 7.61 ± 0.02 7.60 ± 0.08 7.60 ± 0.07 7.38 ± 0.02
2 7.70 ± 0.05 8.00 ± 0.06 8.08 ± 0.12 8.08 ± 0.12
7 7.56 ± 0.50 7.26 ± 0.01 7.25 ± 0.07 7.64 ± 0.54
12 7.72 ± 0.02 7.20 ± 0.01 7.98 ± 0.08 7.96 ± 0.24
ns* ns ns ns
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis DSM 10140 0 8.07 ± 0.06 8.20 ± 0.14 8.40 ± 0.00 8.19 ± 0.10
2 7.96 ± 0.08 7.54 ± 0.61 7.61 ± 0.20 7.12 ± 0.16
7 8.33 ± 0.03 8.30 ± 0.01 8.18 ± 0.23 8.14 ± 0.06
12 8.33 ± 0.03 8.30 ± 0.01 8.00 ± 0.00 8.06 ± 0.08
Ns ns ns ns
L. plantarum c16 0 7.98 ± 0.31 8.12 ± 0.25 8.00 ± 0.23 7.88 ± 0.17
2 8.36 ± 0.34 8.08 ± 0.16 8.33 ± 0.04 8.59 ± 0.01
7 8.35 ± 0.06 8.32 ± 0.03 8.32 ± 0.03 8.27 ± 0.05
12 8.16 ± 0.02 8.22 ± 0.03 8.26 ± 0.00 8.33 ± 0.04
Ns ns ns ns
L. plantarum c16 0 8.45 ± 0.42 8.43 ± 0.15 8.42 ± 0.07 8.33 ± 0.09
2 8.12 ± 0.17 8.26 ± 0.18 8.34 ± 0.08 8.43 ± 0.38
7 8.36 ± 0.08 8.35 ± 0.01 8.38 ± 0.01 8.43 ± 0.04
12 8.10 ± 0.01 8.20 ± 0.04 8.33 ± 0.04 8.30 ± 0.01
Ns ns ns ns

Mean ± standard deviation. *ns, the data for each contact time were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test and the differences were not significant (P > 0.05).