TABLE 3.
Odds ratios from separate multinomial logistic regression models with past measurements related to diabetes control and complications* as covariate of interest and current screening criteria categories as 3-level outcome (“Meets Criteria” as reference for each measure).
| Covariate of interest (model adjustments) | Does not Meet Criteria vs. Meets Criteria | DK/Not Sure vs. Meets Criteria | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) p-value |
OR (95% CI) p-value |
||
| Past HbA1c (1-unit increase) | |||
| Model 0: no additional covariates [N=1973] | 1.11 (1.05, 1.17) | 1.24 (1.08, 1.43) | |
| Model 1: adjusted for age, gender, & duration [N=1973] | 1.06 (1.01, 1.13) | 1.17 (1.01, 1.36) | |
| Model 3: Model 1 + race/ethnicity [N=1972] | 1.05 (0.99, 1.11) | 1.10 (0.95, 1.28) | |
| Model 4: Model 3 + insurance, income, parent education, DM care provider, & clinical site [N=1910] | 1.04 (0.98, 1.10) | 1.03 (0.87, 1.22) | |
|
Note - Models 2 and 5 (which add past HbA1c) not included because HbA1c is already in the model | |||
| Past HTN (Yes vs. No) | |||
| Model 0: no additional covariates [N=2032] | 2.24 (1.13, 4.45) | ---‡ | ---‡ |
| Model 1: adjusted for age, gender, & duration [N=2032]^ | 1.93 (0.96, 3.87) | ---‡ | ---‡ |
| Model 2: Model 1 + Past HbA1c [N=1872] ^ | 1.33 (0.59, 3.00) | ---‡ | ---‡ |
| Model 3: Model 1 + race/ethnicity [N= 2031] | 1.84 (0.91, 3.71) | ---‡ | ---‡ |
| Model 4: Model 3 + insurance, income, parent education, DM care provider, & clinical site [N=1972] | 1.67 (0.81, 3.47) | ---‡ | ---‡ |
| Model 5: Model 4 + Past HbA1c [N= 1818] | 1.13 (0.48, 2.63) | ---‡ | ---‡ |
| Past Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio (ACR) (≥30 vs. <30) | |||
| Model 0: no additional covariates [N=1750] | 1.03 (0.69, 1.55) | 0.76 (0.48, 1.20) | |
| Model 1: adjusted for age, gender, & duration [N=1750] | 1.05 (0.70, 1.58) | 0.75 (0.47, 1.20) | |
| Model 2: Model 1 + Past HbA1c [N=1704] | 0.98 (0.65, 1.49) | 0.72 (0.45, 1.16) | |
| Model 3: Model 1 + race/ethnicity [N= 1749] | 1.05 (0.70, 1.58) | 0.75 (0.47, 1.20) | |
| Model 4: Model 3 + insurance, income, parent education, DM care provider, & clinical site [N=1692] | 1.07 (0.70, 1.65) | 0.70 (0.43, 1.15) | |
| Model 5: Model 4 + Past HbA1c [N= 1648] | 1.02 (0.65, 1.58) | 0.67 (0.40, 1.11) | |
| Past Dyslipidemia (Yes vs. No) | |||
| Model 0: no additional covariates [N=1793] | 1.16 (0.81, 1.65) | 0.82 (0.61, 1.11) | |
| Model 1: adjusted for age, gender, & duration [N=1793] | 0.89 (0.61, 1.29) | 0.84 (0.62, 1.14) | |
| Model 2: Model 1 + Past HbA1c [N=1787] | 0.84 (0.58, 1.24) | 0.73 (0.54, 1.00) | |
| Model 3: Model 1 + race/ethnicity [N= 1792] | 0.89 (0.61, 1.29) | 0.84 (0.62, 1.13) | |
| Model 4: Model 3 + insurance, income, parent education, DM care provider, & clinical site [N=1740] | 0.88 (0.60, 1.30) | 0.81 (0.59, 1.12) | |
| Model 5: Model 4 + Past HbA1c [N= 1734] | 0.87 (0.59, 1.29) | 0.75 (0.54, 1.03) | |
*
Past measure not available for Peripheral Neuropathy or Retinopathy
‡
Estimates not available due to empty cell in 3×2 table (HTN=Y, Screening=DK) – DK excluded, logistic model shown for “Does not Meet Criteria” vs. “Meets Criteria” (DK/Not Sure excluded)
^
Hosmer and Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit test p<0.05