Table 4.
Effects of dietary Ca and NPP levels on tibia ALP activity and ash Ca and P contents of broilers1.
Ca levels, % |
1.00 |
0.35 |
SEM | Ca level3, % |
SEM | NPP level3, % |
SEM |
P-value |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPP levels, % | 0.452 | 0.232 | 0.452 | 0.232 | 1.00 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.23 | Ca | NPP | Ca × NPP | |||
Day 7 | ||||||||||||||
Tibia ALP, U/g protein | 595 | 793 | 399 | 595 | 44 | 694a | 497b | 32 | 497b | 694a | 32 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.99 |
Tibia ash Ca content, % | 38.4a | 33.7b,c | 34.4b | 33.0c | 0.3 | 36.0 | 33.7 | 0.2 | 36.5 | 33.4 | 0.2 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Tibia ash P content, % | 16.6 | 15.6 | 17.4 | 16.6 | 0.24 | 16.1b | 17.0a | 0.2 | 17.0a | 16.1b | 0.2 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.94 |
Day 14 | ||||||||||||||
Tibia ALP, U/g protein | 352c | 661a | 458b | 466b | 34 | 507 | 462 | 24 | 405 | 564 | 24 | 0.20 | <0.0001 | 0.0002 |
Tibia ash Ca content, % | 35.3a | 34.0b | 31.8c | 31.8c | 0.2 | 34.7 | 31.8 | 0.1 | 33.6 | 33.0 | 0.1 | <0.0001 | 0.0002 | 0.001 |
Tibia ash P content, % | 16.7 | 16.2 | 16.1 | 15.8 | 0.1 | 16.5a | 15.9b | 0.1 | 16.4a | 16.0b | 0.1 | 0.0002 | 0.007 | 0.46 |
Day 21 | ||||||||||||||
Tibia ALP, U/g protein | 254c | 508a | 491a,b | 426b | 26 | 459 | 381 | 18.6 | 373 | 467 | 19 | 0.007 | 0.002 | <0.0001 |
Tibia ash Ca content, % | 36.2a | 33.7b | 31.1d | 32.5c | 0.2 | 35.1 | 31.8 | 0.1 | 33.7 | 33.0 | 0.1 | <0.0001 | 0.001 | <0.0001 |
Tibia ash P content, % | 16.7c | 16.2d | 17.4b | 17.6a | 0.1 | 16.4 | 17.5 | 0.1 | 17.0 | 16.9 | 0.1 | <0.0001 | 0.38 | 0.0008 |
a-dMeans within a row lacking a common superscript differ (P < 0.05).
Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; NPP, nonphytate P.
Data represented the means of 7 replicate cages (n = 7).
Data represented the means of 12 replicate cages (n = 14).