Table 3.
Flooring (F) |
Litter |
Wire |
P-value2 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Light lx (L) | 2 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 10 | SEM | L | F | L∗F |
Study 1 | ||||||||||
H:L | 0.32b | 0.30b | 0.36b | 0.59a | 0.78a | 0.60a | 0.26 | NS | 0.002 | NS |
CORT | 5.91b | 5.57b | 5.63b | 6.89a | 7.19a | 6.56a | 1.16 | NS | 0.0004 | NS |
Eye temp | 33.03a | 33.28a | 33.73a | 31.70c | 32.21b,c | 32.50b,c | 0.26 | 0.02 | 0.0001 | NS |
Beak temp | 35.23a | 35.00a | 35.35a | 32.69b | 30.05c | 33.29a,b | 0.54 | 0.002 | 0.0001 | 0.03 |
LTL1 | ||||||||||
LTLG | 157.0 | 94.7 | 47.1 | 60.1 | 169.2 | 59.2 | 58.72 | NS | NS | NS |
LTLI | 129.8 | 53.6 | 82.8 | 101.0 | 231.8 | 134.7 | 53.94 | NS | NS | NS |
Study 2 | ||||||||||
H:L | 0.24b | 0.32b | 0.40b | 0.48a | 0.45a | 0.40a | 0.20 | NS | 0.04 | NS |
CORT | 7.17a | 7.23a | 6.41b | 7.64a | 7.57a | 7.11b | 1.09 | 0.02 | 0.02 | NS |
Eye temp | 35.31 | 35.63 | 35.81 | 35.62 | 35.44 | 35.62 | 0.20 | NS | NS | NS |
Beak temp | 36.29 | 37.18 | 36.96 | 36.96 | 36.27 | 36.95 | 0.33 | NS | NS | NS |
Core temp | 41.83a,b | 41.96a,b | 42.03a,b | 41.58b | 41.83a,b | 42.07a | 0.12 | 0.03 | NS | NS |
LTL | ||||||||||
LTLG | 71.2 | 44.1 | 99.5 | 148.7 | 44.8 | 87.6 | 44.8 | NS | NS | NS |
LTLI | 133.1 | 116.5 | 126.9 | 192.0 | 96.4 | 85.9 | 44.1 | NS | NS | NS |
a,bMeans not sharing the same superscript letter across each row differ at P ≤ 0.05.
Abbreviation: lx, lux.
The LTL test was conducted in the hallway of the facility on day 57 and 58 in study 1 and day 56 and 57 in study 2. Five birds were subjected to the LTL test individually (LTLI) and in groups of 5 (LTLG), and data are reported as means for the pen of birds.
ANOVA P-values represent the overall effects, the main effects of light intensity (L) and flooring type (F) and the interaction of light intensity and flooring type (L∗F).