Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;99(8):4052–4064. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.04.025

Table 1.

Date, age of parent flock (weeks), day (0 or 5), and dose (non-inoculated, or 0.5 mL of 101 or 102 cfu/mL) of challenge and intervention (none (-), CEP, or SYN) for experiments 1 (n = 70 broilers), 2 (n = 70 broilers), and 3 (n = 80 broilers).

Experiment 1 2 3
Date 12 April–3 May 2017 24 May–14 June 2017 23 Oct–13 Nov 2017
Parent flock1 A, 54 wk A, 60 wk B, 57 wk
Day of challenge2 Day 0 Day 5 Day 5
Isolator Challenge (cfu/mL)3 Intervention4 Challenge (cfu/mL)3 Intervention4 Challenge (cfu/mL)3 Intervention4
1 Non-inoculated (-) - Non-inoculated (saline solution) - Non-inoculated (saline solution) -
2 101 None (-) 101 None (-) 102 None (-)
3 101 CEP 101 CEP 102 CEP
4 101 CEP 101 CEP 102 CEP
5 102 None (-) 102 None (-) 102 SYN
6 102 CEP 102 CEP 102 SYN
7 102 CEP 102 CEP 102 SYN
8 102 SYN

Abbreviations: CEP, competitive exclusion product; SYN, selection of pre- and probiotics.

1

In all 3 experiments, the eggs were disinfected with formaldehyde before incubation and in the hatcher before hatching.

2

Challenge with Escherichia coli E38.27 with blaCTX-M-1 on IncI1 plasmid.

3

Inoculated birds (n = 5 out of 10 in each isolator) received 0.5 mL of the mentioned challenge dose.

4

Intervention was implemented in all experiments from day 0, 4:00 pm until day 14, 4:00 pm. In experiment 1, supply of the intervention started immediately after challenge.