Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 23;10(10):1724. doi: 10.3390/ani10101724

Table 5.

The effect of different dietary protein sources and carbon sources on Nile tilapia (O. niloticus) nutrient digestibility.

Experimental
Groups
DM% CP% EE% NFE% Ash%
Protein source
Plant protein. 80.19 b 88.44 b 93.10 72.54 35.85 b
Fish protein. 81.00 a 91.93 a 93.19 72.54 41.99 a
Carbon source
Control (C) 78.48 c 87.98 c 92.35 b 72.47 37.67 b
B-GLY 81.05 b 90.98 b 93.56 a 72.47 39.65 a
B-MOS 82.26 a 91.59 a 93.52 a 72.71 39.44 a
Interaction protein source × carbon source
C-plant protein 77.46 d 85.45 e 92.51 c 72.40 34.50 e
C-fish protein 79.51 c 90.52 c 92.20 c 72.53 40.83 c
B-GLY plant protein 81.01 b 89.51 d 93.46 a,b 72.56 36.54 d
B-GLY fish protein 81.09 b 92.45 b 93.65 a,b 72.56 42.77 a
B-MOS plant protein 82.11 a 90.36 c 93.32 b 72.66 36.52 d
B-MOS fish protein 82.40 a 92.81 a 93.72 a 72.74 42.36 b
p-value
Protein source <0.001 <0.001 0.354 0.973 <0.001
Carbon source <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.355 <0.001
Interaction <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.705 <0.001
RSD 0.44 0.26 0.27 0.42 0.28

DM: dry matter; CP: crude protein; EE: ether extract; NFE: nitrogen free extract; Ash: mineral content; RSD: residual standard deviation. a–e Means with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).