Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 3;99(10):4998–5006. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.044

Table 9.

Growth performance and tibia ash content for chicks in Experiment 31.

Dietary treatment Weight gain (g/chick) Feed intake (g/chick) Gain:feed (g/kg) Bone ash3 (mg/tibia)
1. P deficient diet 263f,g 409e 644c,d,e 296g
2. As 1 + 0.05% KH2PO4 290d,e 447b,c,d 651b,c,d 360d,e
3. As 1 + 0.10% KH2PO4 313b,c 486a 644c,d,e 440b
4. As 2 + 0.10% Ca from limestone 279e,f,g 443b,c,d,e 630c,d,e 356d,e,f
5. As 3 + 0.20% Ca from limestone 299c,d 459a,b,c 650b,c,d 405c
6. As 1 + 12.5% SBM2 265e,f,g 430d,e 616d,e 343e,f
7. As 1 + 25% SBM2 278f,g 419b,c,d,e 663b,c 360d,e
8. As 1 + 5.0% SDPP2 318b 463a,b 686b 406c
9. As 1 + 10.0% SDPP2 353a 486a 726a 507a
10. As 1 + 1.0% MBM2 261g 428c,d,e 612e 331f
11. As 1 + 2.0% MBM2 281d,e,f 428b,c,d,e 656b,c 377d
Pooled SEM 6.7 12.3 13.7 9.7

a-gMeans within a column with no common superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05).

1

Values are means of 5 pens consisting of 5 chicks.

2

Abbreviations: SBM = soybean meal, SDPP = spray-dried plasma protein, MBM = meat and bone meal.

3

Multiple regression of tibia ash (Y; mg) on supplemental P intake (g) from KH2PO4 (X1), KH2PO4 + Ca (X2), SBM (X3), SDPP (X4), and MBM (X5) yielded the equation: Y = 299.9 + 285.5 ± 22.1X1 + 234.5 + 23.2X2 + 103.9 ± 16.8X3 + 357.4 ± 18.2X4 + 177.1 ± 25.3X5 (R2 = 0.89). The (±) values are SE of the regression coefficients.