Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 30;4(10):e00282. doi: 10.1002/pld3.282

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Three different epidermal mutants have increased bulliform cell coverage. (a‐d) Bright field images of hand‐sectioned adult leaves from the indicated genotypes depict previously reported aberrations in epidermal cell types. Arrow = wild‐type‐like bulliform strip (2 cells wide), arrowhead = areas with abnormal bulliform‐like cells. Scale bar = 200 µm. (e) Quantification of bulliform cell number in three bulliform mutants as percentage of all epidermal cells, calculated using (f‐i) Fluorol Yellow stained tissue cross section images. FY = Fluorol Yellow (lipid stain; green), CW = Calcofluor White (cell wall counter stain; blue). White arrow = FY staining of wild‐type‐like bulliform strip cuticle (3 cells wide), white arrowhead in (g‐i) = areas with abnormal BC‐like cells displaying increased FY staining of the cuticle. Scale bar = 50 µm. Values in (e) are given as means + SD (n = 300–380 epidermal cells counted, four biological replicates per genotype). Statistical analysis used two‐tailed unpaired Student's t‐test, with *p < .05, ***p < .001