Table 1.
Nanoparticles | Targeted Pollutants | Effectiveness and/or Efficiency | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Nanochitosan | Pb(II) in water | Adsorption capacity: 32.26 mg/g at pH 6 | [30] |
Magnetic chitosan nanoparticles | Pb(II) and Cd(II) in wastewater | Adsorption capacity: 79.24 mg/g for Pb(II) and 36.42 mg/g for Cd(II) | [23] |
Magnetic chitosan polyelectrolyte nanoparticles | Cd(II) in industrial wastewater | 97.5 removal from the original 100 mg/L concentration | [24] |
Chitosan nanoparticle | Cr(III) in tannery wastewater | 70% removal of chromium in 24 h | [31] |
chitosan magnetite nanoparticles | Cr(VI) in wastewater | 75–88% removal from the standard 500 mg/L K2Cr2O7 solution | [32] |
Magnetic chitosan nanoparticles | Cr(VI) in wastewater | Adsorption capacity: 58.14 mg/g at pH 3.0 | [33] |
chitosan-stabilized Fe/Cu bimetallic nanoparticles | Cr(VI) in different types of water | Removal efficiency: 90% (river water), 85%(tannery water), and 80% (smelting water) |
[34] |
Chitosan-/PVA-coated magnetic nanoparticles | Cu(II) in wastewater | Adsorption capacity: up to 500 mg/g at pH 5.0 | [35] |
Chitosan gel nanoparticles | Cu(II) in wastewater | Adsorption capacity: 78–112 mg/L | [36] |
Chitosan magnetite nanoparticles | Heavy metals in the water part of the sludge | Adsorption: 20–50% more heavy metals than magnetite | [37] |
Chitosan nanoparticles | Eu(III) in water | Adsorption capacity: 114 mg/g, >30 times compared to crab shell particles |
[22] |
Chitin nanocrystals | Ag(I) in water | 27% removal from the original 107.8 mg/L concentration | [38] |
Magnetic chitosan nanoparticles | Azo dyes in wastewater | 94–96% removal at pH 6.0 in 1 h | [39] |
Magnetic chitosan nanoparticles | Dyes in wastewater | Adsorption capacity: 82.2 mg/g for removing Bromothymol Blue | [40] |
Chitosan-silica nanoparticles with immobilized Cu(II) ions | 1,1–dimethyl hydrazine in wastewater | 100% degradation of 1,1–dimethyl hydrazine in 10 min | [41] |
Chitosan modified multi-wall carbon nanotubes | Phosphate in wastewater | Adsorption capacity: 36.1 mg P/g, and 94–98% of the original efficiency after 5 cycles | [42] |
Enzymatic chitosan nanoparticles | Phenols in wastewater | Higher thermostability than free enzyme and same activity | [43] |
Highly deacetylated chitosan nanoparticles | Diclofenac and carbamazepine in wastewater | Adsorption capacity: up to 351.8 mg g−1 for diclofenac | [44] |
Chitosan−silver Nanoparticles | Bacteria in drinking water | 99.99% removal of bacteria in 15 min, and complete removal in 8 h |
[45] |
Chitosan-coated silver nanoparticles | Various toxic contaminants | Inhibition of biofilm formation | [46] |
2(5H)–furanone loaded chitosan nanoparticles | COD* and color in Rice mill wastewater | Better foulant rejection, better removal of COD, and color |
[27] |
chitosan-doped MIL-100(Fe) nanoparticles | Bacteria in wastewater | higher biofouling resistance of 85% comparedto the original 51% | [47] |
Silver-loaded chitosan nanoparticles | Foulants on hollow fiber membranes | Optimal rejection of 89.27 and 86.04% for Reactive Black 5 and Reactive Orange 16 |
[48] |
O-carboxymethyl chitosan-Fe3O4 nanoparticles |
Foulants on membranes | Achieving the lowest irreversible fouling resistance of 4.2% at 0.05 wt.% |
[28] |
chitosan-grafted magnetic nanoparticles | Oil drops in emulsified wastewater | Best flocculation performance at pH 4.0, and reuse up to 7 times | [26] |
COD: Chemical oxygen demand.