Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 27;7(5):ENEURO.0212-20.2020. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0212-20.2020

Table 1.

Noise floor testing

Amplifier Inputs shorted
(μV rms)
Connected by 1 kΩ (μV rms) Connected by 10 kΩ (μV rms) Connected by 10 kΩ and 30-cm cable (μV rms) Inputs open
(μV rms)
OpBox A 1.322 ± 0.005 1.324 ± 0.009 1.337 ± 0.008 1.342 ± 0.006 1.708 ± 0.011
OpBox B 1.282 ± 0.006 1.284 ± 0.006 1.297 ± 0.006 1.306 ± 0.007 1.896 ± 0.021
Grass 0.554 ± 0.009 0.596 ± 0.046 0.589 ± 0.008 0.529 ± 0.018 12.756 ± 0.122
Intan 2.632 ± 0.009 2.708 ± 0.046 3.032 ± 0.055 22.107 ± 1.034 13.104 ± 0.508

Values from noise floor testing of the different amplifiers; 5-min segments of recordings were taken from each amplifier type with differential inputs shorted using a wire, connected using different resistors, or left completely unconnected. To mimic the effect of having EEG travel via a cable in a tethered subject recording, we also connected the amplifier inputs to a 10-kΩ resistor but at the end of a 30-cm shielded two conductor cable. The shielding of the cable was grounded. Mean RMS values of these 5-min segments were calculated using 10 non-overlapping 30-s windows. Mean and SEM values are reported for each combinations of amplifier type and testing criteria; n =10 non-overlapping 30-s windows for all table cells.