Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 15;30(12):6603–6613. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06999-z

Table 4.

Spearman’s R values and p values for correlations between BAMIC and modified Peetrons scores compared with T2, MD and FA and eigenvalues in tear site, haematoma and oedema ROIs

Measurement Score Tear site Haematoma Oedema
T2 (ms) BAMIC R = 0.62; p < 0.01 R = 0.36; p = 0.18 R = 0.48; p = 0.01
Peetrons R = 0.59; p = 0.01 R = 0.51; p = − 0.05 R = 0.68; p < 0.01
MD (×10−3mm2s−1) BAMIC R = 0.49; p = 0.01 R = 0.27; p = 0.35 R = 0.52; p = 0.01
Peetrons R = 0.51; p = 0.01 R = 0.56; p = 0.04 R = 0.57; p = 0.01
FA BAMIC R = − 0.53; p < 0.01 R = − 0.32; p = 0.27 R = − 0.41; p = 0.04
Peetrons R = − 0.51; p = 0.01 R = − 0.19; p = 0.52 R = − 0.41; p = 0.04
λ1(×10−3mm2s−1) BAMIC R = 0.30 p = 0.15 R = 0.11; p = 0.70 R = 0.38; p = 0.06
Peetrons R = 0.29; p = 0.16 R = 0.56; p = 0.04 R = 0.36; p = 0.08
λ2(×10−3mm2s−1) BAMIC R = 0.56; p = < 0.01 R = 0.28; p = 0.33 R = 0.61; p = 0.001
Peetrons R = 0.56; p < 0.01 R = 0.52; p = 0.06 R = 0.56; p < 0.01
λ3(×10−3mm2s−1) BAMIC R = 0.61; p < 0.01 R = 0.41; p = 0.14 R = 0.54; p < 0.01
Peetrons R = 0.70; p < 0.01 R = 0.56; p = 0.04 R = 0.48; p = 0.02