Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 10;184(2):567–583. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05854-5

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis of factors that might influence breast cancer-associated physicians’ attitudes about whether a patient with breast cancer may be pregnant. (N = 911)

Factor Propensity, no OR (95% CI) Wald
P value
P
Low Selective High
Gender .007
 Male 27 166 239 1.44 (1.11–1.89) .007
 Female 38 223 218 Reference
Come from which area .751
 Developed area 20 126 158 1.05 (0.79–1.38) .751
 Underdeveloped area 45 263 299 Reference
Years of practice .662
  < 5 years 40 190 194 0.95 (0.66–1.37) .788
 5 years ~  19 116 150 1.10 (0.75–1.60) .629
 10 years ~  6 83 113 Reference
Volume of breast cancer patients per outpatient service .748
  < 20 34 170 227 1.06 (0.59–1.92) .843
 20 ~  22 156 147 0.91 (0.51–1.63) .748
 40 ~  5 39 51 1.10 (0.56–2.14) .791
  > 60 4 24 32 Reference
Times of participating in academic forum on breast cancer  < .001
  < 2 20 74 54 0.22 (0.12–0.41)  < .001
 2–4 24 187 180 0.41 (0.24–0.68) .001
 5–10 16 106 153 0.54 (0.32–0.90) .019
  ≥ 11 5 22 70 Reference
Times of science popularization about reproduction of early breast cancer .272
 0 17 107 154 1.34 (0.87–2.08) .184
 1 22 122 130 1.09 (0.72–1.66) .688
 2 14 90 81 0.90 (0.58–1.40) .636
  > 2 12 70 92 Reference
Times of consulting about reproduction problems after breast cancer surgery per outpatient service  < .001
 1–2 27 159 259 1.74 (1.07–2.83) .026
 3–4 23 150 101 0.88 (0.54–1.43) .594
 5–6 6 37 50 1.50 (0.83–2.69) .177
   > 6 9 43 47 Reference
Time spent on solving the problem about reproduction in early breast cancer .022
  < 2 min 11 39 47 0.63 (0.35–1.11) .107
 2 min ~  35 200 194 0.58 (0.38–0.89) .013
 6 min ~  9 113 138 0.88 (0.56–1.38) .573
 11 min ~  10 37 78 Reference