Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 30;10:18764. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75958-x

Table 2.

Comparison of ddPCR results on the SARS-CoV-2 positive (N = 15 UTM and N = 15 ESwab) and negative (N = 10 UTM and N = 10 ESwab) subjects of the cohort.

ddPCR Target Positives Negatives
UTM vs ESwab
Log(copies/mL)
Mean ± SD
UTM vs ESwab
P value
UTM vs ESwab
Log(copies/mL)
Mean ± SD
UTM vs ESwab
P value
RNA N1 5.36 (± 1.56) vs 4.20 (± 1.27) 0.0105 nd vs nd na
N2 4.50 (± 1.22) vs 4.75 (± 1.07) 0.7148 nd vs nd na
RPP30 6.12 (± 0.54) vs 6.44 (± 0.68) 0.1876 5.18 (± 0.27) vs 4.94 (± 0.47) 0.3750
Direct N1 3.72 (± 1.22) vs 3.76 (± 0.64) 0.6953 nd vs nd  > 0.9999
N2 4.00 (± 1.09) vs 3.88 (± 0.49) 0.6523 3.47 (na) vs nd  > 0.9999
RPP30 5.96 (± 0.64) vs 6.18 (± 0.75) 0.4545 4.77 (± 0.29) vs 5.22 (± 0.62) 0.1055

Na: not applicable; nd: not detected. Wilcoxon Test p values are reported.