Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 1;9(10):946. doi: 10.3390/antiox9100946

Table 6.

Evaluation of the intervention on the quality of life in participants with T2DM based on general estimating equation analysis (n = 81).

Variable Within-Time
Ref: Baseline ß (95% CI), p Value
Between Group Interaction Group
(AEW) × Time, Ref: (CG) × Time ß (95% CI), p Value
Interaction Group
(Walking) × Time, Ref: (CG) × Time ß (95% CI), p Value
Interaction Group
(both AEW & walking) × Time, Ref: (CG) × Time ß (95% CI), p Value
AEW vs. CGß (95% CI), p Value Walking vs. CGß (95% CI), p Value Both vs. CGß (95% CI), p Value
SF36- PCS −1.794
(−4.301~0.714)
1.366
(−2.335~5.068)
0.908
(−2.892~4.708)
0.670
(−3.174~4.514)
14.034
(10.727~17.342) **
18.017
(14.170~21.865) **
24.483
(20.881~28.085) **
SF36- MCS 1.753
(−2.526~6.032)
0.505
(−4.082~5.092)
1.604
(−3.428~6.637)
0.782
(−3.969~5.533)
−0.378
(−4.846~4.089)
13.360
(7.522~19.198) **
25.649
(20.310~30.988) **
SF36-Total QoL −0.021
(−2.463~2.422)
0.936
(−2.223~2.422)
1.257
(−2.225~4.738)
0.727
(−2.332~3.786)
6.828
(4.099~9.557) **
15.689
(11.964~19.414) **
25.068
(21.961~28.175) **

Note: n: number of participants, ß: regression coefficient, CI: confidence interval, AEW: alkaline electrolyzed water, CG: control group, SF−36: Short Form 36, PCS: Physical component score, MCS: Mental component score, QoL: quality of life. ß values and 95% CIs were estimated using generalized estimating equations after adjusting for stress, anxiety, and depression levels, and carbohydrate, protein, fat, fast food and fiber consumption scores with ** p < 0.001.