Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 12;9(10):3252. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103252

Table 3.

Results of the linear regression analyses model predicting pain interference from pain intensity, pain self-efficacy, pain acceptance, and optimism.

95% CI
Model (R2) β p LCI UCI Tolerance VIF
1 (0.50) (Constant) <0.001 8.99 23.47
Pain intensity 0.71 <0.001 1.06 1.48
2 (0.59) (Constant) <0.001 10.17 23.56
Pain intensity 0.56 <0.001 0.78 1.21 0.75 1.32
Pain self-efficacy −0.14 0.026 −0.23 −0.01 0.64 1.56
Pain acceptance −0.28 <0.001 −0.26 −0.08 0.59 1.67
Optimism 0.14 0.015 0.07 0.76 0.82 1.22
3 (0.60) Pain intensity * Pain Self-Efficacy −0.04 0.538 −0.02 0.01 0.64 1.15
Pain intensity * Pain Acceptance −0.06 0.407 −0.02 0.01 0.56 1.78
Pain intensity * Optimism 0.01 0.825 −0.04 0.06 0.74 1.35

Durbin–Watson = 2.02; CI = confidence interval; VIF = variance inflation factor; LCI = lower confidence interval; UCI = upper confidence interval. The three models were adjusted by age and gender. * Interaction between pain intensity and each psychological factor (moderator effects of each psychological factor in the association between pain intensity and pain interference).