Table 3.
Results of the linear regression analyses model predicting pain interference from pain intensity, pain self-efficacy, pain acceptance, and optimism.
95% CI | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model (R2) | β | p | LCI | UCI | Tolerance | VIF | |
1 (0.50) | (Constant) | <0.001 | 8.99 | 23.47 | |||
Pain intensity | 0.71 | <0.001 | 1.06 | 1.48 | |||
2 (0.59) | (Constant) | <0.001 | 10.17 | 23.56 | |||
Pain intensity | 0.56 | <0.001 | 0.78 | 1.21 | 0.75 | 1.32 | |
Pain self-efficacy | −0.14 | 0.026 | −0.23 | −0.01 | 0.64 | 1.56 | |
Pain acceptance | −0.28 | <0.001 | −0.26 | −0.08 | 0.59 | 1.67 | |
Optimism | 0.14 | 0.015 | 0.07 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 1.22 | |
3 (0.60) | Pain intensity * Pain Self-Efficacy | −0.04 | 0.538 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.64 | 1.15 |
Pain intensity * Pain Acceptance | −0.06 | 0.407 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.56 | 1.78 | |
Pain intensity * Optimism | 0.01 | 0.825 | −0.04 | 0.06 | 0.74 | 1.35 |
Durbin–Watson = 2.02; CI = confidence interval; VIF = variance inflation factor; LCI = lower confidence interval; UCI = upper confidence interval. The three models were adjusted by age and gender. * Interaction between pain intensity and each psychological factor (moderator effects of each psychological factor in the association between pain intensity and pain interference).