Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 29;11(10):903. doi: 10.3390/mi11100903

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Microcontact Printing using MSAs. (A) Fluorescent microscopic images of the microcontact-printed PLL-FITC on a glass substrate. Two different weights were compared: 0.7 g (PDMS stamp only) and 20.7 g (plus 20 g weight). Petal did not hold the weight of 20.7g and yielded no proper transfer of protein. (B) Width of printed patterns. The additional weight significantly thickened the width of Pillar and Bullet printing by almost double. Error bars: STDEV. Statistical analysis: Student’s t-test (*** p < 0.001). (A) Scale bar: 100 μm.