Table 4.
Evaluations of the importance of professionally used medical apps and privately used nonmedical apps among study participants (n=93).
Factor | Evaluation of importance (%) | |||||
Not important | Important | Very important | Not applicable | Missing data | ||
Professionally used medical apps | ||||||
|
Design and operation | 11.8 | 26.9 | 44.1 | 12.9 | 4.3 |
|
Time saving | 1.1 | 17.2 | 65.6 | 12.9 | 3.2 |
|
Data safety | 2.2 | 15.1 | 63.4 | 15.1 | 4.3 |
|
Friends/family use the same app | 50.5 | 11.8 | 9.7 | 21.5 | 6.5 |
|
Image of provider | 43.0 | 25.8 | 11.8 | 15.1 | 4.3 |
|
Quality and topicality of contents | 3.2 | 12.9 | 65.6 | 14.0 | 4.3 |
|
Fun factor | 66.7 | 6.5 | 3.2 | 18.3 | 5.4 |
Privately used nonmedical apps | ||||||
|
Design and operation | 5.4 | 35.5 | 52.7 | 5.4 | 1.1 |
|
Time saving | 0.0 | 31.2 | 60.2 | 5.4 | 3.2 |
|
Data safety | 3.2 | 24.7 | 64.5 | 5.4 | 2.2 |
|
Friends/family use the same app | 24.7 | 40.9 | 23.7 | 8.6 | 2.2 |
|
Image of provider | 58.1 | 24.7 | 4.3 | 9.7 | 3.2 |
|
Quality and topicality of contents | 0.0 | 29.0 | 62.4 | 6.5 | 2.2 |
|
Fun factor | 32.3 | 41.9 | 12.9 | 8.6 | 4.3 |