Table 1.
Author | Type of Study | Country | n patient | n Teeth | Groups of Study | n per Group | Tooth | Etiology of Pulpal Necrosis | Follow-up Time in Months |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ElSheshtawy et al. 2020 [29] | RCT, Parallel | Egypt | 26 | 26 | A. PRP | 11 | Incisor | Secondary to trauma and dens invaginatus | 12 |
B. BC | 11 | ||||||||
Mittal et al. 2019 [30] | RCT, Parallel | India | 16 | 16 | A. PRF | 4 | Incisor | Secondary to trauma/caries | 12 |
B. BC | 4 | ||||||||
Ragab et al. 2019 [31] | RCT, Parallel | Egypt | 22 | 22 | A. PRF | 11 | Incisor | Secondary to trauma | 12 |
B. BC | 11 | ||||||||
Ulusoy et al. 2019 [32] | RCT, Parallel | Turkey | 77 | 77 | A. PRP | 18 | Incisor | Secondary to trauma | Until complete healing 10–49 |
B. PRF | 17 | ||||||||
C. PP | 17 | ||||||||
D. BC | 21 | ||||||||
Rizk et al. 2019 [33] | RCT, Parallel | Egypt | 26 | 26 | A. PRP | 13 | Incisor | Secondary to trauma | 12 |
B. PRF | 12 | ||||||||
Shivashankar et al. 2017 [34] | RCT, Parallel | India | 60 | 60 | A. PRF | 20 | Incisor | Secondary to trauma/caries | 12 |
B. BC | 15 | ||||||||
C. PRP | 19 | ||||||||
Alagl et al. 2017 [35] | RCT, Split Mouth | Saudi Arabia | 16 | 32 | A. PRP | 15 | Incisor and premolars | Secondary to trauma/caries | 12 |
B. BC | 15 | ||||||||
Bezgin et al. 2015 [36] | RCT, Parallel | Turkey | 20 | 22 | A. PRP | 11 | Incisor and premolars | Secondary to trauma/caries | 18 |
B. BC | 11 | ||||||||
Narang et al. 2015 [37] | RCT, Parallel | India | 20 | 20 | A. MTA | 5 | NR | Secondary to trauma/caries | 18 |
B. BC | 5 | ||||||||
C. PRF | 5 | ||||||||
D. PRP | 5 | ||||||||
Jadhav et al. 2012 [38] | RCT, Parallel | India | 20 | 20 | A. PRP | 10 | Incisor | Secondary to trauma/caries | 12 |
B. BC | 10 |
Legend: RCT: randomized clinical trial; PRP: platelet-rich plasma; BC: induced blot clot; PRF: platelet-rich fibrin; PP: platelet pellet; MTA: mineral trioxide aggregate.