Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 9;17(20):7373. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207373

Table 3.

Differences in measurement factors between the upper and lower category groups in assessments of masticatory ability.

Measurement Factors Total
n = 100
Masticatory Efficiency Masticatory Score Satisfaction with Mastication (VAS Score)
LG UG p-Value LG UG p-Value LG UG p-Value
n = 51 n = 49 n = 50 n = 50 n = 51 n = 49
Nutritional status: BMI (kg/m2) 22.6 ± 3.3 22.5 ± 3.0 22.7 ± 3.5 0.634 21.8 ± 2.7 23.3 ± 3.6 0.013* 21.6 ± 2.9 23.6 ± 3.3 0.001 *
Basic attributes
Sex (male:female) 53:47 29:22 24:25 0.430 a 25:25 28:22 0.548 a 26:25 27:22 0.680 a
Age 75.3 ± 6.5 75.9 ± 6.7 74.6 ± 6.2 0.335 76.4 ± 6.5 74.2 ± 6.2 0.111 76.5 ± 6.5 74.0 ± 6.3 0.064
Occlusal supports
Occlusal supports (unit) 4.1 ± 5.0 2.4 ± 3.5 5.9 ± 5.7 0.003 * 2.3 ± 3.9 5.9 ± 5.4 0.000 * 3.0 ± 4.2 5.3 ± 5.5 0.059
Molar occlusal supports (unit) 1.7 ± 2.7 0.63 ± 1.6 2.7 ± 3.2 0.001 * 0.8 ± 1.9 2.5 ± 3.1 0.003 * 1.0 ± 2.2 2.3 ± 3.1 0.027 *
Gnathological muscle strength
Tongue pressure (kPa) 27.8 ± 8.4 25.7 ± 8.3 30.0 ± 8.1 0.017 * 27.2 ± 7.4 28.4 ± 9.4 0.282 27.0 ± 8.9 28.6 ± 7.8 0.370
Cheek pressure (kPa) 16.4 ± 4.0 16.0 ± 4.4 16.9 ± 3.4 0.202 17.2 ± 3.6 15.7 ± 4.2 0.110 16.4 ± 4.4 16.5 ± 3.4 0.983
Occlusal force (N) 274.7 ± 212.4 215.1 ± 183.0 336.9 ± 224.6 0.000 * 229.7 ± 204.9 319.8 ± 212.1 0.003 * 266.8 ± 209.8 283.0 ± 217.0 0.617

Mean ± standard deviation; * p < 0.05 [a chi-square test; no mark Mann–Whitney U-test].