Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 7;11(10):680. doi: 10.3390/insects11100680

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Correlation of TEs with “duplicate type” NUMTs and “complex NUMTs”. (A) The proportion of “duplicate type” NUMTs with or without TEs on the flanking sequences. (B) Pie charts showing the content of different TE superfamilies in flanking regions of “duplicate type” NUMTs in the four species W. pumilae, A. bakeri, P. tridentata, and D. vasculosae. The colored areas represent the TE type with the highest proportion in each species. (C) The proportion of “complex NUMTs” with or without TEs on the interior and flanking sequences. (D) Pie charts showing the content of different TE superfamilies in flanking or interior regions of “complex NUMTs” in the four species W. pumilae, S. agreansis, A. bakeri, and D. vasculosae. The colored areas represent the TE type with the highest proportion in each species. In (B) and (D), the results of TE type proportions of only four species are shown, because the number of TEs of the other species is small, or the proportions of different TEs types are very similar.