Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 28;12(10):619. doi: 10.3390/toxins12100619

Table 2.

The characteristics of in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo intestine models.

Models Types Advantages Limitations References
In vitro-2D intestinal model Caco-2 cells, IPEC-1 cells, IPEC-J2 cells, IPI-2I cells and PSI-1 cells, co-culture of different cell lines) well-established and relatively cheap only containing a single cell type without villus and crypt domain [39,40,41,42,43,44]
In vitro-3D intestinal model enteroids, also known as organoids or mini-guts partially recapitulate the anatomy of native epithelium, have the ability to passage at an almost unlimited scale the effects of substances on the luminal side are poorly investigated, considerable cost, do not contain the immune and stromal cells [41,45,46,47,48,49]
Ex vivo applied in humans, rodents, swine, poultry and horse a more accurate model to mimic the physiology in vivo fail to achieve long-term culture, careful and laborious preparation [45,50,51]
In vivo commonly used models include mouse, rat, chicken, turkey, fish, pig, sheep and bovine provide the information based on the whole animals, thus they could corroborate the toxicity in humans effectively the use of live animals should follow 3R (replacement, reduction and refinement) principle [1]